Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hay there people,

im trying to find out if i will hav trouble wiring up a rb25det using a r32 20det loom and ecu.i know about the side and top feeddz.

will i have to wire in a ballest resister???????

also do each injector hav positiv and negative pins on them or??? :laugh:

also how can i tell if my ecu is 20det or 25de.iv look at alot of dif ecu and the numbers on the front cover but im hereing alot of dif storys please help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280792-injecter-wires/
Share on other sites

hay there people,

im trying to find out if i will hav trouble wiring up a rb25det using a r32 20det loom and ecu.i know about the side and top feeddz.

will i have to wire in a ballest resister???????

also do each injector hav positiv and negative pins on them or???

As I mentioned previously, the rb20det silvertop loom will go straight onto a r32 rb25 head only. It will run a r33 head as well, but the injector plugs will need to be changed, and it will also have no VVT solenoid plug. Nor will a chipped rb20 ECU have the ability to run VCT.

So if your not going to run VCT, and your able to change the injector plugs then it should be fine.

You will not have to wire in any resistor, both are high imp injectors. Each injector will have a common 12+ wire on it which goes back to your IGN relay. The ECU then pulses ground signals to each injector in order to fire it.

Each injector on the negative side will have a different coloured wire indicating the cylinder number on the ECU pinout.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280792-injecter-wires/#findComment-4736695
Share on other sites

Just completed a 30det in my 32,used a rb20det loom and had no troubles,also using a mapped 20 ecu,nit sure if any of this helps,head was a r33 rb25de s1

im doing to transplants atmo.got 30e bloc with 25de vvt head.runing 32 loom and gen1 25de chiped ecu.what sort of injecters did u use.im thinking of using sr20det 1z

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280792-injecter-wires/#findComment-4737285
Share on other sites

As I mentioned previously, the rb20det silvertop loom will go straight onto a r32 rb25 head only. It will run a r33 head as well, but the injector plugs will need to be changed, and it will also have no VVT solenoid plug. Nor will a chipped rb20 ECU have the ability to run VCT.

So if your not going to run VCT, and your able to change the injector plugs then it should be fine.

You will not have to wire in any resistor, both are high imp injectors. Each injector will have a common 12+ wire on it which goes back to your IGN relay. The ECU then pulses ground signals to each injector in order to fire it.

Each injector on the negative side will have a different coloured wire indicating the cylinder number on the ECU pinout.

ok thanks is there a way to hard wire vvt to a 20det ecu?its geting dynod on friday and has piggy back in it(no afm)

also on my own project 30e 25vvt head,im runing gen1 25de ecu chiped for plus t and was told i kan hard wire vvt off the oxysensor if i put a 5volt relay or sumthing b4 it gets to ecu??????? chers guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280792-injecter-wires/#findComment-4737312
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...