Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Inquiring if any one can help out with a few questions about Nismo edition Skyline's?

I have a 2001 ER34 GTT Nismo Bay side blue that I got a company in Sydney to import over from Japan for me about 4 years ago, now 36000k on the clock. I only drive her about once a week if that due to a busy working lifestyle, but now things have slowed down due to the economy so have I! and so will the money lol. Got mates with all tuning and testing tools for what ever upgrades I want to do, but we would like to know a few things before we start boosting her up or changing any parts. We tested the boost @ 11 Psi and the thing has never been tampered with, no boost controller she is all stock apart from the HPI stainless steel bell-mouth Dump, HPI Stainless dual front pipe, X-Force-3" high flow cat converter, Kakimoto 06&R cat back exhaust system

Questions

Did Nissan produce a factory GTT Nismo?

If so! Dose anyone know spec’s on the turbo/engine?

Do they have steel turbines or ceramic?

Factory Boost Psi?

Engine components/forged pistons?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281370-2001-er34-gtt-specs/
Share on other sites

doubt it

get your vin number up or pm it so someone so they can fast it for you . do you know that you can re arrange the factory pipes to raise the boost or someone could have drilled out the restrictor and it will run 12 psi and look completlly stock

doubt it

get your vin number up or pm it so someone so they can fast it for you . do you know that you can re arrange the factory pipes to raise the boost or someone could have drilled out the restrictor and it will run 12 psi and look completlly stock

We have had a good look over it and it has not been messed with. arranging the pipes will only give you 1/2 Pis lift, we look into that one at the start.

The Model and Vin:

GF-ER34

GGKBRTFR34UDAAU-B-

or

6U90000ER34202285

Edited by GTTNismo

I actually remember this car when it was first advertised, funnily enough.

Given that it was a very late build (January '02) I suspect that Nissan did with the R34 what they did with many R33s - built some run-out specials using Nismo parts in order to clear out the last of the stock. Following this theory, I suspect you'll find any Nismo parts on the car were cosmetic rather than performance-enhancing.

Cool car though, and very rare just as it is.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey buddy, I've got a really late 2001 Model series 2 supposedly "Nismo" Bayside Blue GTT aswell, but from what i know there is no such thing as a 'Nismo GTT'. All series 2 GT-t's do come with steel wheel turbines unlike series 1 er34's which have nylon compressor wheels. There's not much info about Series 2 NEO RB25det's and their steel wheel turbos, but i've driven three stock ones and they all seem to hit just under a bar of boost.

These series 2 GT-T's also have more torque due to the extra boost.

Series 2: 37.0 kg*m (362.85 N*m) / 3200 rpm

Series 1: 35.0 kg*m (343.23 N*m) / 3200 rpm

http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/nissan/skyline/2000_8/

I actually remember this car when it was first advertised, funnily enough.

Given that it was a very late build (January '02) I suspect that Nissan did with the R34 what they did with many R33s - built some run-out specials using Nismo parts in order to clear out the last of the stock. Following this theory, I suspect you'll find any Nismo parts on the car were cosmetic rather than performance-enhancing.

Cool car though, and very rare just as it is.

Sweet thanks for the info, So do we know if they have a steel wheel turbine?

Edited by GTTNismo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...