Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

have you experinced cases where light weight pullies made no difference?? reducing the rotating mass of a motor would decrease its work load, requiring less power to turn its self, they say its a similar effect to that of a light weight flywheel, im not saying i believe their claims hands down, but it makes sense to me...

This is correct, and fine if your removing the weight of accessory pulelys etc, but the crank pulley is needed as a balencer to help harmonics issues the straight 6's have like Chrispy said. Some people actually go heavier...

Yes underdrive pulley's will give some effect, but not much, they are more necesary if your engine spends most of its time in the higher rev range (instead of its designed lower rpm operating range) since for example an alternator might peak at ~ 3000rpm engine speed, after that its just waste, or a water pump might spin too fast to have enough cooling time in the radiator (and thermostats being non-intelligent will just be fully open, when they need to be restricting to slow down waterflow so the radiator can cool it effectively).

underdriving power steering, will do nothing, as there is next to no load when not steering (if you cut your PS belt on a dyno, i'd be suprised if it made 0.1kw [100w] difference). Water pump, you should go electric, for best temperature control, otherwise when not revving the ballbag out of your engine (i.e. long idling, low speed traffic) your going to cook your engine, wheres an electric water pump will have alot more control, and less drain + no cavitation. Ditto for thermo fan.

I'd say leave your power steering alone, and then all thats left is alternator, which depends on your current draw, if you turn on all your accessory's, lights etc, and the alternator is still producing more power than there is being drawn (when underdriven at idle) then thats fine, but if its not, it will just be more hastle then its worth, for the sake of a kW or 2...

You might be able to get a high amperage alternator and underdrive that, but $ per kW, possibly not the best investment.

remove your clutch fan for sure, water pump if your keen (and go electric), but everything else i would leave as is. Best bang for buck though is to save for some cams, $500-$600 will get you some regrinds, $900 will get you some billet brand names (which can be more wild) if your on stock management (bound by stock rev limit + vct), try and keep the duration low and the lift high. If you go the CAM route, you might want to let it breath a little easier also, with a larger or twin TB, and apppropriate sized intake.

Edited by SKiT_R31
This is correct, and fine if your removing the weight of accessory pulelys etc, but the crank pulley is needed as a balencer to help harmonics issues the straight 6's have like Chrispy said. Some people actually go heavier...

Yes underdrive pulley's will give some effect, but not much, they are more necesary if your engine spends most of its time in the higher rev range (instead of its designed lower rpm operating range) since for example an alternator might peak at ~ 3000rpm engine speed, after that its just waste, or a water pump might spin too fast to have enough cooling time in the radiator (and thermostats being non-intelligent will just be fully open, when they need to be restricting to slow down waterflow so the radiator can cool it effectively).

underdriving power steering, will do nothing, as there is next to no load when not steering (if you cut your PS belt on a dyno, i'd be suprised if it made 0.1kw [100w] difference). Water pump, you should go electric, for best temperature control, otherwise when not revving the ballbag out of your engine (i.e. long idling, low speed traffic) your going to cook your engine, wheres an electric water pump will have alot more control, and less drain + no cavitation. Ditto for thermo fan.

I'd say leave your power steering alone, and then all thats left is alternator, which depends on your current draw, if you turn on all your accessory's, lights etc, and the alternator is still producing more power than there is being drawn (when underdriven at idle) then thats fine, but if its not, it will just be more hastle then its worth, for the sake of a kW or 2...

You might be able to get a high amperage alternator and underdrive that, but $ per kW, possibly not the best investment.

remove your clutch fan for sure, water pump if your keen (and go electric), but everything else i would leave as is. Best bang for buck though is to save for some cams, $500-$600 will get you some regrinds, $900 will get you some billet brand names (which can be more wild) if your on stock management (bound by stock rev limit + vct), try and keep the duration low and the lift high. If you go the CAM route, you might want to let it breath a little easier also, with a larger or twin TB, and apppropriate sized intake.

awsome answer man, alot of good points, looks like cams will be next, thanks!

  • 3 weeks later...

People don't underdrive pulleys for the power gains (although there is a very slight gain, since power = force x speed, and you're reducing the line speed of the belt). The main reaso they do it is if the engine lives at high RPM, to protect the alt and keep the water pump in the efficient range.

Excessive RPM will caviatate a water pump - not a good thing (means it's trying to pump air instead of water)!! If you plan to race the car, by all means use an underdrive crank pulley for those reasons. You WILL get some free horsepower, but I doubt anyone this side of Michael Schumaker would notice it. If it's just a street engine - probably not worth the effort.

Do NOT change your multi vee belt for a single vee. You might as well swap your RB engine for a pushrod 202 if that's the case - big step back in technology. (less slip and far more resistant to being turned inside out at high RPM). If you've ever raced a rotary, you'll know the heartache of throwing fan belts at high RPM. Multi Vee belts do not do this.

Lastly - reduced rotating mass (eg lighter pulleys) do NOT give more power. That is a fallacy!! At best, they will make the engine free rev quicker.

I'm not a fan of EWP's (have heard horror stories from people who have spent many years in racing circles). Each to their own through, as I know a lot of people use them happily in racing. I won't try and force my opinion on that topic onto others.

^ spot on to the post above - no power will be gained - the engine will still be the same. You will be taking load of the engine - which will help response - but I imagine the response gains will be tiny for the money spent.

But if budget is not a concern definately go for it. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...