Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Must read

Hi all , this is my story about about the OH performance and jason rollos car , which he never said why it blew up ,

jason brought this car about 10 mths it came to my work shop with a busted engine , going back before it blew jason stacked his car manily under the rad support pannel pushing the engine off the mounts and crushing the HKS boost soloind that was mounted right next to the inlet plemium , after jason got his back from the panel shop he was asked to get all the mechanicals checked out by a mechanic , but jason was happy that he got he car back from the repair place drove the car and over the west gate bridge is when the engine appently blew , as stated in Jasons testomony in court, this idiot didnt get the car checked before driving this car and stuffed it him self, as the court findings , after the car was brought to me on a tow truck , i removed the engine as jason has asked and pulled it down and found 3 pistons have detoninated , finding that it had a major smash in the front and asking jason what had happened he then told me about the accident , after 10 mths and a crash he saying my fault , sorry i dont think so , in any ones eyes , even in court, it didnt stand up , the other problem Jason has after i called Jason to say what i found what is the problem and how it was caused , and how it could be fixed at what priced jason refused to pay for any thing , well there was a bill for taking the engine out and taking it apart, he didnt have the money , the vechile was stored at the work shop after many appointments with Jason that he promissed to collect his car and pay a small amount for the work carried out that jason asked for , it was storred at the work shop still , there was a brake in at the work shop , his car was targeted only , the police may think it was jason buy never was proved , his car was retured to a state where ordered by the court that jason agrees to collect it , there is always two sides to every storie and never go by the complant , read the whole truth , well jason good luck with the GTR ,

Edited by turbo rxp
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/286323-oh-performance-vs-jason-rollo/
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...