Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I just bought my self a cheapo banga for daily use and will be keeping the gtr for weekend use.

I dont want to be paying full insurance and was wondering if anyone had any experiance with insurance where you pay for weekend use, or pay for it per kilometer you drive?

thanks,

steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/293761-part-time-insurance/
Share on other sites

Dare I say, give some Insurance places a call and ask?

u dare not!

haha

My dads mustang is covered for exactly what your after. Talk with Shannons if your over 25... They will sought out a package which suits you.

my gtr is insured as a weeekender ( less than 8000 km a year ) Wesfarmers (Lumley Special Vehicle) is who i am with

$700 a year for $30000 cover car must be parked in a garage at home

though Shannons wanted over 1 k for same cover

my gtr is insured as a weeekender ( less than 8000 km a year ) Wesfarmers (Lumley Special Vehicle) is who i am with

$700 a year for $30000 cover car must be parked in a garage at home

though Shannons wanted over 1 k for same cover

Geez worth shopping around - 33 GTR $35k agreed value, full comprehensive, $200 (?) excess, $715 pa with HBF of all people.

Geez worth shopping around - 33 GTR $35k agreed value, full comprehensive, $200 (?) excess, $715 pa with HBF of all people.

whenever i have contacted HBF they tell me they dont insure imports so i hope when you claim they will actually cover you

whenever i have contacted HBF they tell me they dont insure imports so i hope when you claim they will actually cover you

They do.. MY friends R33 Non turbo GTS is insured with them... and he has made a claim before and they paid out...

whenever i have contacted HBF they tell me they dont insure imports so i hope when you claim they will actually cover you

Gaz

Interesting as I just reinsured it and they rang to remind me. Even discussed the possibility of a 400R - that one they were not so sure of (over $100k).

Very specific about the car and it has been with them for 3 years or so.

Now you are making me worry.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...