Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Zero One for ps2 From Genki,2003. This game is much like tokyo extreme racer but better.The features that makes it different from tokyo extreme racer is a testing feature that allows u to test your 0-400 and 0-1000 times while u change ur car settings, New bodykits which let u choose from frp,urethrane and dry carbon ( my r34 GTR has got the latest Veilside kit). There is a wide range of rims too (work,Hart,Advan,and others)

New cars, like the new ZED,and RX8,more stunning graphics(especially during rain/thunder).There seems to be a more wider array of cars, even european cars as well.The engine notes sound pretty real too.

The background of tokyo and other cities seem to be more realistic in this game, its hard not to chrash when u pass tokyo tower and other places.

There is also a feature that allows u to race more than one racer in the same opposition team in one battle.This is very cool.

The opening cinema scene is stunning as well,with a supra,corvette(the sound of the engine roar sends a chill to my spine),r34 GTR, Ae86,

There is more of phantasy to this game somewhat, with evil samurai castles and what not,if u play the game youll understand what im talking about.

so..are u gonna be the next Japan highway king?

p.s this game is not released in australia, mine is a japanese version cd,but its worthwhile to search for it, i havent slept for a long time playing it.I give it 5 stars, better than GT3 in my opinion. Anyone else played this great game?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29410-zero-one-shutoku-highway-battle/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...