Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a cefiro with a rb20e engine, the head gasket blew and when i pulled off the head it was in a bad state. I purchased a rb20e (carb) head and block, took off all my parts and put it on to the new head and block (converted it to fuel injected, so i used my distributor, air intake etc.) set the timing to tdc, at first it would not start so pulled of my injectors cleaned and reinstalled, it starts and idles at about 500rpm however when i put my foot on the X to rev it i get no response, it feels like its going to cut off and when i remove my foot it picks back up. any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/295339-rb20e-not-reving/
Share on other sites

If it goes better when you back off from WOT then it means possibly that your AFR is out. Probably the timing as well.

You would have to assume that if you have replaced a faulty Head/Block with OK replacements,

and your bolt ons were running ok with your old Head/block prior to the faulty head problem,

then somehow your fitting of the items causes the engine to not start.

This could include the cam timing setup as well as the possibility of air leaks causing AFR problems.

1. RECHECK TIMING

2. CHECK for AIR/VACUUM LEAKS

3. CHECK FUEL DELIVERY & PRESSURE

4. CHECK SPARK

the block had rb20 as part of the engine number, the head looks like the ones that came on the rb20et. The block also looks different than mine in that it looks stronger, now in trinidad the a31 were sold new as the altima which came with rb24 single cam carb., this engine was bought from a foreign used dealer who imports used parts from japan, so i am not sure if thats how it came stock.

Probably 24 heads...and your problem, heads and block having timing trouble.

Check out what all the guys suggested, if it's still not fixed, engine swaps are f**kin easy on these things.

or even strip out the bay down to the block, and go DET heads and loom.

Sorry, I just reread the first post.

I thought you had bought a replacement head and put it on your existing block.

Just to clarify, You originally had an RB20E (fuel injected) and you bought a replacement motor which was carburettor.

Then you swapped all of your EFI stuff onto the replacement motor.

As far as I understand, RB24S and RB30S were the only carburettor RB engines. So I'm guessing that maybe you were sold an RB24S.

Although, you also said that the block has an RB20 engine number..... can you double check that?

After some searching I have found nothing relating to RB20S's. However the wiki article makes reference to a common mod being to put the a DE head on but retain the carbys for an RB24s. Perhaps you have an RB24s in disguise with an RB20DE head on top? or perhaps just an RB20e head? odd thing to get though :).

Quick edit: can't be a 20 head on a 24 because they are incompatible.

Daisu you are correct, my original engine was fuel injected, but it was hard to find a replacment one in good condition. this guy who i have bought engines in the past said he had a rb20 but with carb. and all i needed to do was use back my intake system along with the distributor. the engine was in good condition so i took it. on the block the engine number starts with RB20, i even took of the carb. myself, so it came like that from japan. now the tapit pan cover is shaped like the ones you find on the rb20ET. Based on what you guys are saying (that rb carbs mainly came on the rb24s and rb30s) so i am guessing that the person who had it in japan did a mix and match meaing put a 24 or 30 head on the rb20 block, If this was done to gain HP i don't know. I have tried to research the rb20 carb on the net but came up empty. The block is also different than my orig. one. it looks stronger, there are ribs on the side roughly where each piston chamber starts and finishes (like the rb30 block or even rb20ET) here are some pics

post-24788-1257732800_thumb.jpg

post-24788-1257732821_thumb.jpg

post-24788-1257732839_thumb.jpg

post-24788-1257732857_thumb.jpg

post-24788-1257732866_thumb.jpg

Edited by who's next

Man, please don't tell me you have a RB30 here in T'dad. I'll take it off of you!

You could have my engine for cheap and use back your old head. Only the lifters were beginning to make noise on my RB20E.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...