Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a R33 GT-R with a Greddy Profec B Spec II Boost Controller installed and I was wondering if anyone could help me to understand the settings.

I had my car dyno tuned and the boost controller set for 14 psi in high mode and 12 psi in low mode on the standard turbos. I initially didn't want to set the boost too high as I wanted to make sure that the turbo's would last.

However, I have decided on a turbo upgrade in the new year as I really want more power (HKS 2530's or HKS GTRS's).

I have read here that someone has the standard turbo's running at 15 psi...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=1773956

Is this safe? Is it safe to push them any harder?

It was also mentioned in this post that after a month or two power dropped. I also feel this but I am not sure if I am just used to the extra power now. About 10 weeks ago I had a Haltech Platinum Pro ECU installed and it was dyno tuned at the same time. When I first got it back, it felt like a rocket. Now it still feels quick but it just doesn't give me the same experience. Keeping in mind that I have only owned this car for 3 months, it is definitely possible that I have simply grown used to the power. Any way to check for this or anything else that could be stopping the car from producing optimum power?

I would like to know how to set my boost to 15 psi without the help of a tuning workshop. Is this possible without any extra equipment like a dyno? If so, could anyone explain the process?

1 bar (14.7psi) is the most you want to run safely through ceramic turbos in bursts (ie. not at the track), the stock ceramic turbos are just handgrenades waiting to happen and can take an engine with them with ceramic dust.

Never used a jap boost controller, but you want to modify the duty cycle option slightly (leave gain alone as it's already tuned).

1 bar (14.7psi) is the most you want to run safely through ceramic turbos in bursts (ie. not at the track), the stock ceramic turbos are just handgrenades waiting to happen and can take an engine with them with ceramic dust.

Never used a jap boost controller, but you want to modify the duty cycle option slightly (leave gain alone as it's already tuned).

Didn't think of that... I was thinking that if I am going to upgrade turbo's soon, it wouldn't bother me if the standard turbo's died but I definitely don't want my engine going with it.

I think I might just leave it as is for now. I might just get the shop to have a look at it to determine if the power has dropped or not... I will give it a minor service soon anyway.

if its only 1psi more just turn the knob from the main screen whilst in hi boost mode and increase the value a couple % then press the knob. load it up and watch the boost gauge, if its too much drop it back a %, if its not enough keep turning it up. gain adjusts how hard it comes onto boost, too much and it'll spike. set gain is how much boost is needed before the solenoid lets the actuator see any pressure, best to have it set 2-4psi below your target boost, depending on how well your wastegate controls boost. personally i'd just leave it how it is until you get new turbos

Yes, I know it's only 1psi more but that's still 7% more boost. I was just thinking if it was easy to do, it might mildly satisfy my hunger for more power over the next month or two while I plan out/save up for the power upgrade.

I'm getting a minor service done soon, I might just get them to look into it for me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...