Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I notice from the boost vs rpm plot I received from my dyno tune that the boost gradually falls off from about 10.5psi down to 8.5psi at redline. I am using the Powerdigger Hybrid EBC. This took me by surprise, because I've never noticed this falloff on the factory boost gauge.

Is it correct that the factory ECU creates the boost level signal from the airflow meter signal? If so, could the falloff be due to a non linearity in the conversion of airflow to boost pressure? It just seems to me that the EBC might be doing it's job as best it can, using the boost level signal from the ECU, and that the only way to fix this would be to install a MAP sensor. (although I have no idea whether the Hybrid EBC could directly make use of a MAP sensor).

Greg.

Could be that the stock wastegate actuator isnt strong enough to hold that amount of boost.

I had a similar problem, I changed the wastegate actuator for a garret adjustable item. Now it holds boost right to redline.

Adam

The EBC's solenoid fits in *series* with the pressure line to the wastegate actuator, right? (i.e, it's not a bleed type solenoid) This means that when the solenoid is in the closed position (blocking all pressure from reaching the wastegate actuator), the wastegate would have no pressure on it, and the boost would rise to whatever the wastegate would allow. Do you mean the actual wastegate actuator, or the wastegate itself?

Greg.

Powerdigger are telling me the car *does* have a seperate boost sensor - i.e - seperate to the airflow meter. Now I'm confused!

Greg.

IIRC the stock boost gauge takes its reading off the back of the inlet manifold. AFM does not read boost pressure.

The EBC's solenoid fits in *series* with the pressure line to the wastegate actuator, right? (i.e, it's not a bleed type solenoid) This means that when the solenoid is in the closed position (blocking all pressure from reaching the wastegate actuator), the wastegate would have no pressure on it, and the boost would rise to whatever the wastegate would allow. Do you mean the actual wastegate actuator, or the wastegate itself?

Greg.

A combination really. The stock wastegate actuators are sometimes not strong enough to hold the wastegate shut, so the wastegate opens more and boost drops off.

Adam

A combination really. The stock wastegate actuators are sometimes not strong enough to hold the wastegate shut, so the wastegate opens more and boost drops off.

Adam

Ok, thanks. I do know that if I crank up the EBC's boost setting, the boost skyrockets (to the point of inducing a fuel cut), so if the problem is with the wastegate actuator, it must be a problem that only exhibits itself after being on boost for a relatively long time, because it is definitely strong enough for a short burst.

Greg.

Skylines certainly do have a MAP sensor, it's used to provide the fuel cut if you overboost the motor. The AFM is used for fuelling though.

Sometimes the turbo can't flow the extra boost at high rpm. When you crank it up and hit boost cut, is it still holding the higher boost near redline? Or did you only test at ~3k RPM... my turbo will hit 15psi in the midrange but drops back to 10-11psi by redline, using a bleed valve.

Yes, it is the stock turbo, but I do have a dump & 3" exhaust.  

Thanks,

Greg.

For what it's worth, here's my dyno plot - looks like I slightly exaggerated the boost dropoff - it only drops to about 9.5psi, not 8.5psi as I said earlier. Is this small dropoff normal/expected with my setup? (air filter is a K&N panel by the way)

Greg.

Skylines certainly do have a MAP sensor, it's used to provide the fuel cut if you overboost the motor.  The AFM is used for fuelling though.

Sometimes the turbo can't flow the extra boost at high rpm.  When you crank it up and hit boost cut, is it still holding the higher boost near redline?  Or did you only test at ~3k RPM...  my turbo will hit 15psi in the midrange but drops back to 10-11psi by redline, using a bleed valve.

Ok, thanks for the info. I called a performance workshop and they too said that the standard turbo may have trouble flowing 10.5psi at high revs, although if the boost is set to, say, 15psi, it will drop to about 10psi at high revs - this agrees with your observsations.

I certainly did not test the high boost to redline - as soon as I heard the engine splutter, I pulled back. (I didn't even know about fuel cut overboost protection when I did this little test - I thought I may have blown my engine and was very relieved. I had assumed that the workshop would probably have calibrated my EBC such that it was not possible to crank the boost up so high - boy was I wrong!)

Greg.

p.s I can't seem to figure out how to get the attachment to upload - sorry.

Powerdigger helped me find the MAP sensor - it's located behind the driver's side top suspension mount, just in front of the firewall. I can clearly see the hose going to the manifold. I can also see a seperate wire spliced in to the cable that runs in to the cabin - this must be the pressure signal for the EBC. (the Powerdigger Hybrid EBC has an open loop mode - I thought *perhaps* my EBC had been wired for open loop mode, but fortunately that's not the case, unless of course there's a fault in the cabling). If I do decide to monitor this boost signal, it's going to be fairly easy to access it. I'm probably not going to bother though, because it seems that the slight boost falloff I'm experiencing is probably entirely normal.

Greg.

Hmm interesting. I would have thought a MAP sensor would be better but I guess if a hose pops off the MAF sensor method will still stop the turbo from overspinning..

I guess it follows then that if you increase airflow (intake exhaust and head/cam work) then the stock ECU will stop the fun at lower boost levels because you've got more flow. So the 'boost cut' will be limiting your total power output rather than boost per se...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...