Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1996 R33 GTS-T

Imported in 2007 in Pristine condition with 58,000kms, first owner in Australia. Regularly Serviced with fully synthetic Motul oil. Well over $20,000 spent on quality additions increasing all areas of performance and looks.

83,000km

Low Boost 263rwkw @ 14 psi Hi boost 304rwkw @ 19 psi

Car is in prestine condition, All areas of the car have been attended to and all parts have been purchase new with the "do it first time properly" approach

KR4 Sonic Silver

Engine

Standard internals (83k kms)

GCG Garrett 550hp Turbo

3in Dump Pipe with Screamer Pipe

3in Hi-flow Cat Converter

Apexi N1 3.5in GTR Exhaust

Nismo 555cc injectors

Walbro 550hp fuel pump

HKS Super Airflow Pod filter

HKS SSQ Spec 2 Blow off valve

Greddy trust E-manage Ecu

Trust spec LS intercooler

Greddy profec b spec 2 EBC

Driveline/Suspension

Exedy Ceramic 4puk clutch

Nismo 2 way differential

Nismo S-tune suspension

Nismo Suspension arms

Nismo Strut braces

Exterior

Nismo Bodykit

Custom Front bar

Nismo Carbon Pillar Garnishes

GTR Rear wing

Nismo Rays Engineering LM GT4 Forged Wheels/ Potenza tyres 225 front 255 rear

Tinted Windows

Interior

Nismo 400R Bucket seats

Nismo Gearknob

Carbon Dashboard surround

Kenwood CD-mp3

Look forward to handing it on to another skyline enthusiast that would appreciate the work and condition of the vehicle

Price $25,000

Edited by ON EDGE

Warnings coming for each of you that can't seem to follow the forum rules.

If you have a problem with the car advertised, or the price being asked, keep it to yourself or pm the threadstarter.

The front seats are genuine nismo gtr 33 seats, and are immaculate, i am will to sell them, and the weels if i can get an offer, might put em in the parts sale section.

Yesterday, 02:26 AM - Car is also fitted with Z32 AFM and Nismo S-tune Brake pads, All genuine offers considered

Yesterday, 03:36 PM - The front seats are genuine nismo gtr 33 seats, and are immaculate, i am will to sell them, and the weels if i can get an offer, might put em in the parts sale section.

Yesterday, 05:01 PM - Car must go make an offer

Yesterday, 06:36 PM - Price drop $23,000 car no use in the shed

4 posts in a day = excessive. Continue to argue you can go sell your car elsewhere.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...