Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone's put in any sound deadening stuff? Got a pretty pumping system but my zorst is just killing the sound! Am considering lining my doors, boot and roof with Dynamat, but to actually put it in seems to be a major hassle cos gotta remove a lot of panels... Has anyone used this? and what kinda diff does it actually make to road noise? sound quality of speakers??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30116-sound-deadening/
Share on other sites

i will be attempting to do my doors over this break ... it looks easy enough to do doors and the panel behind the back seat and the boot ... however to do the roof and even the floors is stretching it ... i'd do the easy ones first then do the hard ones ... so i'd only do the doors and the boot and the back seat if u were serious ... i think the other places are too hard to be bothered ... imho

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30116-sound-deadening/#findComment-612306
Share on other sites

i had six box's used in my car. boot lid, entire boot. as well as under neathe the dash(dash was removed) doors and under all the back and front seats. the back side pannels where removed and a shit load of other places. if we could eventually get to it we deadned it.

it sounds nice but in the end a sub is made to kill the car. :D and i sill have quite a few rattles but it outdoes most of the commonwhores that think there the shit. lol

deadening may be hard but it is worth it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30116-sound-deadening/#findComment-612542
Share on other sites

i'd go g-spot serenity + gspot serenity paint over dynamat. serentiy max costs about $100 for a large pack (enough to do 2 doors) compard to dynamat which is $200 for the equivalent. Dynamat is good stuff, but unless u've got $$ to spend, buy more serenity max and do it. how much do u want to spend? do the doors and the boot and that should be adequate, ofcourse u get better results deadening every panel ...but u should first figure out which panels r the ones making the noise. its just the doors r the noisiest cos thats where the speakers sit..and rattle it.

use the paint to get the hard to reach areas.

remember, theres lotsa deadening u can do urself aswell, ie. placing foam or things like that in crevices etc.

want better results? add another layer ontop of what u've done. so basically, spend time finding which panels need deadening.

yes it reduces road noise and other things aswell...since ur concerned about exhaust, i think u may have to do the floor..that'll be very expensive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30116-sound-deadening/#findComment-613497
Share on other sites

aiming for a system towards clarity. So far got: alpine 9815 deck, DLC176a front splits, spr 172b rears, earquake 12 db sub, alpine mrpt220 sub amp. Am pretty happy with this set up but am starting to notice a lot of interference noise - esp a subtle boom from behind the doors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30116-sound-deadening/#findComment-616116
Share on other sites

start with the deadner in the doors. you might notice a few loose things while you have the covers off. just give it the once over before you rap the doors.

other then that. it sounds like youve got your self a very nice setup.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30116-sound-deadening/#findComment-616476
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...