Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok....

I have a V35 sedan in which I replaced the "stock" suspension with 350z Track suspension to lower it 1". I have driven it for a few months now and my Mrs keeps complaining that it was a better ride b4....

Seeing as my original V35 suspension can't be refitted (one front shock is leaking) and they looked like NISMO shocks (dark red colour), I am in the market to buy some coilovers....

My question is:

1. Can a coil over setup be adjusted to match stock ride comfort and also be lowered by that 1" I want?

2. Someone explain to me what the damper setting is and what the spring rate is?

I really wanted a the TEIN EDFC setup, but seeing as it's $4K+ easy...I will opt for a cheapy manual setup, say under $1k being advertised on ebay...

Valuable advice would be hugely appreciated...

Once the 'issue' is fixed, my current 350z suspension will be up for sale..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302920-noobie-question-suspension/
Share on other sites

^^^ +1

in all seriousness, there is almost always a compromise between comfort n handling. If ur gf wants the comfort of stock suspension back, fitting aftermarket coilovers will almost guarantee to be worse than ur current 350z setup. Lowering a car will also mean a firmer ride in most cases, improved handling at the cost of comfort. IMO the z suspension would be your closest bet to stock comfort.

Bilstein PSS9 or PSS10 coilovers for 350z will apparently give you a better than stock ride comfort if you don't take the car to the track.

http://g35driver.com/forums/brakes-suspens...-w-updates.html

I've got the Ohlins DFV coilovers w/- 20" and I or the wife don't feel there is a massive differance to stock on the softer damping settings. There's a noticeable increase in feedback from the road, but no harshness.

I wouldn't want to go any harder on the street tho.

Edited by mosoto
I have a V35 sedan in which I replaced the "stock" suspension with 350z Track suspension to lower it 1". I have driven it for a few months now and my Mrs keeps complaining that it was a better ride b4....

How bad is it for her? Is it just a bit too harsh, or way too harsh?

If its only a little too harsh, if you're on a budget consider getting Koni Yellow dampers. I ran a set with stock 03 Z33 springs. When they're at the softest setting the setup is softer than stock. The car's a bit floatier as a result, but its not a major issue on the streets.

Firming them up when she's not around will involve jacking the rear of the car up, unfortunately, but unlike some brands its not a "strut out" job (assuming you can't get to the top of the struts in a V35 sedan, which is the case in a 350Z if you don't want to drill into the trim). If you can reach the rear strut tops easily, consider another brand of adjustable dampers. I think Bilstein sell dampers separately, but I don't know of anyone who's bought them before.

2. Someone explain to me what the damper setting is and what the spring rate is?

The spring rate is the amount of mass required to compress the spring by a unit distance. Australia and Japan uses kg/mm, so a "7kg" spring requires 7kg to be put on top of the spring to compress it by 1mm. 14kg compresses it 2mm, etc. The higher the number, the more load required to compress it. Which means the harder it will feel.

Springs can come in linear rate and progressive rate. The former spring is simple. Lets say a spring can compress a total of 30mm. The extra weight required to compress it from 29 to 30mm is the same as compressing it from 15-16mm, which is the same from 0-1mm. The feel of the suspension is linear as a result.

A progressive rate spring requires less mass at the beginning of its range than the end. As a hypothetical example, it might only take the addition of 5kg to move it from 0-1mm but it you might need to add an extra 7kg when its compressed to 10mm in order to get it to 11mm. This means it'll feel softer over small movements (like bumps) but as you load it up harder, it'll stop letting the body lean as easily. It also means the car will feel a bit less responsive initially, as small lateral G-forces get absorbed by the spring rather than being converted into a change in direction.

Dampers (aka shock absorbers) control the movement of the spring. Dampers can control the movement both during compression (or bound) and expansion (rebound). Increasing the bound damping increases the hardness of the ride as the entire setup is less willing to compress. Increasing the rebound damping means the spring is slower to decompress, and softens the ride.

For your aims (and, by yours, I mean your girlfriend's) I wouldn't bother with a Tein setup. I've never been in a car with Tein Comfort Sports but they do run the same spring rates as Super Streets the last time I checked. The SS' are noticably harsher than stock. Even with a softer damper, the higher spring rate will still not make it comfortable.

FYI Teins (and most Japanese dampers) only adjust the rebound damping. Initial compression of the spring is unaffected, which means at low speed (i.e. over speed humps) playing with the dampers doesn't have a particularly noticable affect on ride comfort. Adjusting the Koni Yellows affects bound and rebound (not independently) so the change in ride/comfort can be felt at mundane speeds. In terms of adjustability, I much prefer my old Konis to my current Teins.

A mate of mine who used to own a Z33, who was after ride rather than handling, didn't like the Tein SS' because they were too harsh. He ended up running Tokico D-Spec adjustable dampers with Tanabe NF210 springs (which he felt was a spot on setup for his aims, even with his 19" Volk Racing wheels). The problem is that it'll lower your car even more, and there's no height adjustability in that setup.

Personally if the further ride height drop is acceptable I'd consider Eibach Pro Kit springs instead. They're progressive rate, and from what I can see the Tanabes are linear rate. I never rode in his car so I'm not sure how the Tokicos felt, but I can highly recommend the Koni Yellows from personal experience.

The 19s might also be killing the ride. Both in terms of the lack of sidewall, and the weight. The heavier the wheel the less control the suspension has over its movement, which will make the car feel crashier. Getting a smaller, or at least lighter, wheel might dial out some roughness.

What Alan said is very good info.

One option i can think of is still getting coilovers, but custom order them and specify a low spring rate so it will be comfortable, then when you want to carve some corners, stiffen the coilover unit via it's adjustability to compensate for the spring. Also, you can adjust your stillen sway bars for this (from memory, you got stillen sways and exhaust?).

Also, another contributing factor of ride harshness is your stillen swaybars as the bars reduce independent lateral movement of each side of the suspension. So if yours are set to medium, you can try to set them to soft and see if your missus accepts that.

You can also try to hunt down some later model 350z sussy. 03 z suspension is the 2nd hardest z factory suspenion released. I know the 06s had softer dampers and possibly springs. Goodluck.

One option i can think of is still getting coilovers, but custom order them and specify a low spring rate so it will be comfortable, then when you want to carve some corners, stiffen the coilover unit via it's adjustability to compensate for the spring.

Fulcrum is the official importers of Tein, and they get their products revalved for Australia. I think they also use a softer spring. It'd be worth investigating, but ride comfort is so subjective I'd want to try it out first.

Also, you can adjust your stillen sway bars for this (from memory, you got stillen sways and exhaust?).

I'd try and find someone with coilovers first, and ride in the car. I know of one or two people on 350Z-Tech who've got PSS9s, but one of them has been custom sprung/valved for track use.

Also, another contributing factor of ride harshness is your stillen swaybars as the bars reduce independent lateral movement of each side of the suspension.

I found swaybars only had a subtle effect on ride comfort. In a straight line there's no change, and only if I hit a bump while cornering hard did I notice that the car wanted to skip.

You can also try to hunt down some later model 350z sussy. 03 z suspension is the 2nd hardest z factory suspenion released. I know the 06s had softer dampers and possibly springs

Yeah, I think it was the 06 that copped the Euro-spec suspension. Softer spring/damper setup, and stiffer swaybars. The 03 is nasty. It's not just that its stiff, but the dampers don't seem matched to the springs and so its crashy.

I believe that the Track also ran a harder setup than the Touring. I ran the OEM 18" wheels (with OEM tyres) for a while on my car. When a mate with an 03 Track and I swapped cars for a bit we both noticed that the Track was less comfortable over the bumps. However, I've never seen any documentation (official or Internet-sourced "spec sheets") confirming this.

Also, what tyre pressure are you running? Higher pressures will give you less sidewall flex, and I have found that it can make a noticable difference to ride. Same with the inherent stiffness of the sidewall on your tyre. With the same air pressure, my RT615s are firmer than my old FK452s and there's only a quarter of a mm difference in sidewall height.

You could try dropping the pressures first and seeing if it meets with the girlfriend's approval. If you've gone for a very aggressive sports tyre, try something with a softer sidewall. Toyo T1Rs have a reputation for soft sidewalls, but still provide a reasonable amount of grip.

Edited by scathing
  • 2 weeks later...

Found out the V35s need to have the rear damper out if they want to be adjusted, unless you intend on cutting up the boot.

Koni dampers, or something with an electronic controller, would be the way to go unless you don't intend on ever adjusting it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...