Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, on the R32 GTST circuit race car we run 400 lbs per inch (7.25 kg/mm) front springs and 250 lbs per inch (4.5kg/mm) rear springs. That's on very smooth race tracks in the dry, on rough tracks or in the wet, we run up to 20% less than that.

The job of the spring is to hold the car up, absorb the compression loads and allow extension to make the tyre follow the road surface. Too high a spring rate lessons the tyre's contact with the road. It is not the job of the spring do other things, like limit the roll, that's the job of the anti roll bars. Likewise, it is not the job of the spring to limit the front end dive under brakes or the rear end squat under acceleration, that's a job for the anti dive and anti squat suspension geometry.

That's the main reason why I personally am not all that keen on Japanese suspension kits. They try to do everything with the spring and damper rates. They do that to such an extent, that I can't even use their road suspension on the circuit.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31310-cusco-comp-s/#findComment-632364
Share on other sites

Cheers Sydneykid, it's all good :(

so what would you reckon would be the best rates for road use, I don't mind a bit of firmness but the way it is now it's going to wreck the rest of the suspension. Maybe 270-300lbs for the front and 170-190lbs for the back? you probably have much better anti-roll set-up than me ( i assume mine is still standard ) so I may need a strong enough spring anyway? am i even making sense???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31310-cusco-comp-s/#findComment-632454
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...