Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hp @ 6200RPM

350Z = 287hp , 214 KW

g35 = 280hp , 208.8 KW

torque @ 4800RPM

350z = 371.5 NM

g35 = 366 NM

wheelbase

350Z = 2650mm

G35 = 2850mm

overall length

350z = 4315mm

g35 = 4628mm

overall width

350z = 1815mm

g35 = 1816mm

Overall height

350z = 1320mm

g35 = 1392mm

coefficient of drag

350Z = ?

g35 = .29 (.28 with aero)

seating configuration

350Z = 2 seats

g35 = 2+2

curb weight

350z = man 1463kg, auto 1468kg

g35 = 1549kg

weight distribution

350z = 53/47

g35 = 52/48

fuel tank

350z = 76 L

g35 = 75.71 L

head room

350z = ?

g35 = front 995.7mm, rear 881.4mm

leg room

350z = ?

g35 = front 1113mm

shoulder room

350z = ?

g35 = front 1361mm

City L per km

350z = ?

g35 = ?

Im not sure if all these numbers are correct

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31373-g35-versus-350z/#findComment-633352
Share on other sites

from a Japanese site, and translated using babblefish:

350Z Fairlady Z version ST

Standard-vehicle itself price (Tokyo area) 360 ten thousand Yen drive system FR car names type UA-Z33 transmission 6MT size weight fixed capacity door several total length x full x total height 4310 x 1815 x 1315 mm interior long x interior width x interior high 1000 x 1475 x 1100 mm wheel based 2650 mm roadspace 120 mm vehicle weight 1450 kg riding in a car fixed capacity 2 name door several 3 standard color black/橙/the red/blue/pearl option color diamond silver/the sparkling silver/premium liquid silver engine type there is a DOHC V type 6 cylinder LEV and the type VQ35DE turbo is not total cubic displacement 3498 cc use fuel unleaded premium gasolines Fuel tank capacity 80 L efficiency highest outputs 280 ps (205.94 kw)/6200 rpm largest torques 37 kg m (362.85 N m)/4800 rpm power weight ratio 5.18 kg/ps fuel consumption rate (10/15 mode travelling) 9.7 km/L minimum turning radius 5.4 m power transmissions running gear tire ago after 245/45R18 225/45R18 91W 96W? Brake system (before) ventilated disk type brake system (after) ventilated disk type suspension (before) multi-link type suspension (after) multi-link system

Sorry for the poor english! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31373-g35-versus-350z/#findComment-633418
Share on other sites

And the V35 350 GT premium:

Standard-vehicle itself price (Tokyo area) 356 ten thousand Yen drive system FR car names type UA-CPV35 transmission 6MT size weight fixed capacity door several total length x full x total height 4640 x 1815 x 1395 mm interior long x interior width x interior high 2025 x 1455 x 1135 mm wheel based 2850 mm roadspace 125 mm vehicle weight 1530 kg riding in a car fixed capacity 4 name door several 2 standard color black/the silver/pearl option color burning lead-lead/crystal blue engine type there is a DOHC V type 6 cylinder LEV and the type VQ35DE turbo is not total cubic displacement 3498 cc use fuel unleaded premium gasoline fuel tank capacity 80 L efficiency highest outputs 280 ps (205.94 kw)/6200 rpm largest torques 37 kg m (362.85 N m)/4800 rpm power weight ratio 5.46 kg/ps fuel consumption rate (10/15 mode travelling) 9.3 km/L minimum turning radius 5.7 m power transmissions running gear tire ago after 245/45R18 225/45R18 91W 96W? Brake system (before) ventilated disk type brake system (after) ventilated disk type suspension (before) independent suspension multi-link type suspension (after) independent suspension multi-link system

They're both cool! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31373-g35-versus-350z/#findComment-633423
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...