Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have this R33 RB25 cylinder head thats been sitting around for a little while. I was going to use it for an rb30 twin cam conversion but I have lost interest. The head is not assembled, but all parts were removed as per the workshop manual. Each part have been placed in a resealable plastic bag and labelled. I intended on having the head crack tested, resurfaced and having the valve train cleaned but I just cannot be f**ked with it anymore.

I am located on the Gold Coast but I am happy to organise for freight to the major cities (I only use Northline). I can have it delivered to your doorstep if you are from a business otherwise it'll just be depot to depot. Local pick up is welcome.

There are a couple of small parts missing here and there but nothing that you can buy from else where or brand new from Nissan.

The cylinder head is sold as is.

10052010944.jpg

10052010945.jpg

10052010947.jpg - there should be a baffle on the inside of this cover, I do have it but it has been drilled out - you can buy another cover from these forums or use a tap to have it screwed back in.

10052010946.jpg

10052010948.jpg - valve train in plastic bags, I didn't bother leaving the lifters in oil because I wanted to have them cleaned properly before being reinstalled.

10052010951.jpg - random milk crate full of shit such as the inlet manifold, throttle body, a few coil packs and a few other little bits. The injectors are still attached to the fuel rail.

10052010952.jpg - a different view...

I do have the cam shafts, for some reason the pic didn't come out. I also have a spare throttle body as one of the throttle linkages was bent. The crank angle sensor is also included.

I am not looking to separate any of the parts.

Price is $300 firm. As I said, I am happy to send interstate if the buyer covers freight costs.

PM if interested.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320027-fs-rb25de-head-300/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...