Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.police.wa.gov.au/ABOUTUS/News/S...70/Default.aspx

from a leach hwy runner point of view, almost get caught by a radar gun today, someone thought it will be safe if the route not on that list, the fact is, NOT

any bro know is that the radar gun man are totally unpredictable? they just set it at a random place?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/323949-speed-camera-location-is-useful/
Share on other sites

Ok i had to read that a couple of times to decipher it... But after figuring out what i think you are trying to say, you will find that officers on patrol can setup wherever they feel it is likely they will catch speeders, so it is entirely random.

If u click that link at the top and download the "Speed camera locations to 13 June 2010", maybe u will understand what i ve said....

just want to say i totally forgot there is a radar gun man exist and almost get caught by the radar gun on leach hwy :thumbsup: and remind someone who are using that list as reference...

Speed Camera locations are required to be published, as a notice, because they can't technically take your photo without your permission or notifying you that your picture MAY be taken in a certain area / time. Likewise, red light camera's are sign posted. Speed camera's are MEANT to have a sign before, saying "are you speeding?" (then camera, then sign "anywhere, anytime")

Because handheld radars do not take pictures, they can be set up, anywhere, anytime...without notice or publication.

They're totally random and unpredictable.

The End.

Speed Camera locations are required to be published, as a notice, because they can't technically take your photo without your permission or notifying you that your picture MAY be taken in a certain area / time. Likewise, red light camera's are sign posted. Speed camera's are MEANT to have a sign before, saying "are you speeding?" (then camera, then sign "anywhere, anytime")

Because handheld radars do not take pictures, they can be set up, anywhere, anytime...without notice or publication.

They're totally random and unpredictable.

The End.

thanks nic

'handheld radars do not take pictures', so what kind of evidence they use to charge you? or there are a video recorder associate with the radar?

If u run pass a radar at 110mph how can the officer chase you down? or they just let you go (what the..)

have zero knowledge on the radars sorry for asking too much

ya ignore that plx, i dunno why i wrote in that way......sorry for hurting your brain

It's more the fact that you though you were only able to get caught on those roads listed.

Cops are everywhere, if you think you can wake up in the morning and check that list, and decide you are safe to speed on every road but the ones they say there will be a radar on... you're an idiot.

If u click that link at the top and download the "Speed camera locations to 13 June 2010", maybe u will understand what i ve said....

just want to say i totally forgot there is a radar gun man exist and almost get caught by the radar gun on leach hwy :D and remind someone who are using that list as reference...

Let's re-write that so people understand.

If you click on that link and download the "Speed Camera Locations to 13 June 2010" you will understand what I have just said....

I just wanted to say I totally forgot there was police with a radar guns and I almost got caught by one on leach hwy, just a reminder for anyone who is using that list...

now was that so hard to write so people could understand? either people are getting dumber and dumber these days that they can't even put a sentence together.

Edited by SexycanI

Cops don't even need to show you a reading on their handheld to issue a fine, and they can issue fines withouth a photo, with their partner present who acts as a witness.

Even without their partner (off duty), cops can still issue arrests and shit.

Let's re-write that so people understand.

If you click on that link and download the "Speed Camera Locations to 13 June 2010" you will understand what I have just said....

I just wanted to say I totally forgot there was police with a radar guns and I almost got caught by one on leach hwy, just a reminder for anyone who is using that list...

now was that so hard to write so people could understand? either people are getting dumber and dumber these days that they can't even put a sentence together.

Lol that is still fail English? :D

Hand-helds are lasers..

In-car are radars.. (similar to multinova but a different band)

The cops don't have to show you the reading on the hand-held but if it's spectacular enough they will.. e.g. when I got done as a P-plater for 115 in a 60, he made me get out and look at the reading.. 115kmh 315m away :D

Lol that is still fail English? :domokun:

comparing it to his sentence? which one is more understandable?

most threads lately are full of sentences you can't even understand, go back a page and look at CaM!'s thread about Good Cops.

most of the time they show you the readout as it instantly elimates any doubt that you were speeding. they go through plenty of people and probably get lots arguing, so its just easier that way.

at the end of the day, if you want to go out for a thrash, know where you can do it with very little chance of getting caught. dont go winding out 3rd on the freeway in the middle of the day.

comparing it to his sentence? which one is more understandable?

most threads lately are full of sentences you can't even understand, go back a page and look at CaM!'s thread about Good Cops.

come on, we are not having an English exam here do we? take it easy, it is our spare time on the internet who having a little chat

I do apologize for what i wrote at the beginning ;)

most of the time they show you the readout as it instantly elimates any doubt that you were speeding. they go through plenty of people and probably get lots arguing, so its just easier that way.

at the end of the day, if you want to go out for a thrash, know where you can do it with very little chance of getting caught. dont go winding out 3rd on the freeway in the middle of the day.

VERY TRUE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...