Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys...

Another embarassing noob question here.. :Oops:

Regarding tyres, does the psi required change depending on profile and size ??

For example, i have 235/45 on the front, and 265/35 on the rear (18 inch)..

Should they all equally be inflated same psi ?? Back harder ?? Front harder ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32452-psi-for-tyres/
Share on other sites

in r33 it isn't understeer you are worried about though

I run 43 psi all round. Although lower rear pressure will give you better traction for accelerating. Just go as high as traction under hard acceleration permits with your tyres.

Once you go hard enough you may get the occasional chirp as it looses traction over tiny road bumps when accellerating from the lights.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32452-psi-for-tyres/#findComment-659520
Share on other sites

Hi guys, we run 25 psi (cold) in the 235/40/17 Yokohama A032R's, that goes up to 34 psi when they get hot (after 1 lap). Any more pressure than that and they start to overheat in spots as (being radials) the higher pressure doesn't let them follow the track surface. Since only some parts touch, they get hot and blister.

An extreme example, as the compound is soft, but the same principle applies to any tyre. Too high a pressure reduces the tyres ability to follow the road surface. I would strongly suggest that any Skyline with appropriate suspension geometry, would need tyre pressures in the 28 to 34 psi range on the road. For the track, unless the geometry has been set up for it, adding 5 to 10 psi helps keep the tyre more upright under the extreme side loading you get on the circuit. For the drags I would suggest 5 to 10 psi less would aid the traction for launch.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/32452-psi-for-tyres/#findComment-671970
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • Yuh, but that one is NLA. There might be an equivalent, but I haven't looked.
    • If you hadn't bought a stand alone one already, nismo make a bolt on adjustable FPR https://www.efisolutions.com.au/nismo-fuel-pressure-regulator-sr-rb-s13-180sx-r32
    • I know and understand they are principally the same. They both cause lock under decel, but the 1.5 nomenclature implies "half" or less locking force, or it allows for more slip or a speed differential between both wheels. Right now the driving manners with the 2 way is pretty rough on transient to full off throttle in the backroads. In other words letting off the throttle too rough is not forgiving, great for drifting, tougher for controlled grip driving.      Yeah, I have watched that video a couple times, I am more so just looking for the confirmation that both part numbers offer the same ramp architecture and are just different settings from the factory.     38420-RSS15-B5  38420-RSS20-B5
×
×
  • Create New...