Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When i bought the car , the bloke said that he had the car on a dyno for 4 hours.

I was wondering how often a car should be dynoed, it was last on a dyno on 24/10 2001. My car is running great but VERY VERY RICH, which is supposed to be a safety thing.

Should i get the car on a dyno to see how things are or is it a waste of money & time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33131-how-often-to-dyno-tune/
Share on other sites

if it is running VERY VERY RICH, then that is sort of an over kill.

I think that a safe air:fuel setting is 11:1 or even 11.5:1

above that would be too lean for constant on boost type driving.

My R32 GTST was at about 12.3:1 on MAX load when on the dyno but it never had a problem cause it would only be on that for a few seconds at a time.

If your car is as rich as you make it out to be, it would be effecting performance, it would be fouling up your plugs and oxygen sensor and you would be getting SHIT fuel economy..

The way I see it, you have an R33 GTR.

It is worth what... over $40K??

spending $70 for a single power run on a dyno would show you HOW rich/lean your car is...

then I believe the most expensive I have seen is about $110 per hour for dyno tuning at like Croydon Racing Development (CRD) at Silverwater.

If you have a POWER FC or some sort of aftermarket programable ecu, then it wouldn't even be more than an hours worth of tuning..

I think for under $200 you could get your car tuned to perfection and still be safe.

As for how often you need to get your car dyno tuned, once it's set, you shouldn't have to retune unless you do another power mod.

say you went and got it tuned and then later found that you only had a cat back and got some dump/front pipes which resulted in some more boost and power, you would be wise to make sure that this hasn't put your A:F ratio out of whack...

NOTE: the above is my opinion.

Some people say that the optimal air:fuel ratio for a turbo car is 12:1....

But I personally would prefer to be a little on the saefr side of Optimal...

Hope that helps..

Pretty much spot on there GTST...

Don't expect to get your car tuned at CRD for any less than $800 though... That's their minimum cost... Jim is an excellent tuner, but quite expensive...

The optimum ratio for air:fuel on any combustion engine is about 12:1 - if you are looking for power.

However, if you run an engine at 12:1 you are looking at over-heating problems, which is why most engines run slightly rich, because with less air in the mixture the engine will run cooler.

You probably already know this!

Thanks for the info GTST, its running too rich , i've alreadly replaced the 02 sensors 2 months ago & i'm not getting too much above 200km city driving. When i give it in 1st gear, off the mark a big black cloud of smoke comes out about 2-3 metres high (like a diesel truck)lol.

The car has a lot of mods ( standard internals i think), it was taken to the HKS workshop in Japan before it got imported to aust & it only produces 245awkw, but it does feel quick, people on this forum seem to be getting that on stock turbos & with less mods?

I've got to take it to eastern creek for some times in the near future.

200km to a tank??

Jebus man...

you weren't kidding about it being rich..

I would definitely spend a few hundred tuning it..

that's not right..

I'd also recommend a spark plug change after the mixtures are corrected..

I think that on your baseline run, the A:F ratio's will be off the chart.. as in below the 10:1 reading that most dyno's are calibrated to.. (I think)

245kw at the wheels! I love rb26s.

If you're blowing that much smoke and getting such bad milage i reckon you need to have it looked at. Theres probably another 20kw hiding in there easy :)

If it is only blowing smoke when you put your foot down then it may just be the pump settings are out of whack and it needs a bit of road tuning to iron out drivability issues.

Still talk to a tuner, dyno time is a great way of seeing what your car is doing anyway so give it a go

"Don't expect to get your car tuned at CRD for any less than $800 though..."

My car (the magna, not the FD, obviously) was on the dyno for several hours (quite a few actually) and he charged me about $200... (actually, that covered install too...)

It was a sponsored car (unichip sponsored, among others) and I was giving him a good plug on my website though!

Nice guy - and a great tuner!

Definitely expensive - but you get what you pay for

It only blows smoke when i'm taking off & a few seconds after reving the engine (stationary). The dyno tuner said that he had noted it down when the car was last there.

He said that there was a air flow metre problem caused by a bad compressor surge. He said that some one had modified the turbo housing or the turbo wheel.

Where do i start to correct this problem. He said that he doesn't deal with those type of problems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...