Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1994 GTS-T R33 Skyline

engine:

RB25det motor 135k's on the clock did a service - 2000ks ago

gt3076r turbo

custom braided oil feed and return lines from ats

full turbo back 3" exhaust with a custom screamer

blitz cs intercooler

simota intake

oil cooler with filter relocation kit

sard 850cc injectors

walboro fuel pump

splitfire coilpacks

greddy profec b 2 boost controller - set at 16 high and 12 low

microtech lt12 with hand controller

exedy brass button clutch

nismo 1 way diff

gearbox has been rebuilt, still have reciepts

suspension and brakes

isc coilovers

full slotted dba rotors 

QFM pads

Braided brake lines

on ssr light weight wheels wrapped with kuhmos ku36 fronts and ku31 rears

interior

drift steering wheel

r34 GT-R seats (extremely comfortable)

nismo leather shift knob

tisonic immobliser

32537_398322284150_535969150_4327968_1703224_n.jpg

46020_423376014150_535969150_4982348_567435_n.jpg

40788_423376044150_535969150_4982349_3715879_n.jpg

car is currently making 236kw on 16psi on pretty much a detune, can make 285+ if wanted

car is excellent condition with no crash history, well looked after

Asking 13,500 ono. selling for finacial reasons, im not in a hurry to sell so dont bother low balling. 

car also comes with 3 months rego. Still have reciepts for most work done

pm me on here for more or can call on 0430204243

Edited by follar99
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/333709-1994-r33-gts-t/
Share on other sites

lol "heavily modified" hilarious, mad id love to see what you would call an actual heavy modified car, these are just light mods mate new turbo, injectors, computer, fuel pump, cooler and boost controller are the beginning steps to a heavy modified car.

in real terms heavy modified is internal work or pushing 300kw safley a few bolt ons is nice and im shure the car is awsm but when i saw heavy modified i was expecting the works, diff, full suspention, brakes, chassi work, forged engine pushing 300+kw thats heavy in my books.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/333709-1994-r33-gts-t/#findComment-5415775
Share on other sites

oh cheers for the input man, like i finally know what a heavily worked car is now. been living my life without this information. seriously man f@ck off if you dont have anything good to say or about buying the car, tool

  • Nope 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/333709-1994-r33-gts-t/#findComment-5416726
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...