Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

After a clutch for my r33 gtst.

Will need to have plenty of meat and able to handle atleast 250rwkw.

Only really need the plate as I have a nismo/exedy flywheel and pressure plate already.

In Sydney

Daniel

email or msg here

[email protected]

Cheers

Daniel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337123-wtb-clutch-for-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

After a clutch for my r33 gtst.

Will need to have plenty of meat and able to handle atleast 250rwkw.

Only really need the plate as I have a nismo/exedy flywheel and pressure plate already.

In Sydney

Daniel

email or msg here

[email protected]

Cheers

Daniel

whats the purpose of the car?

try KUDOS motorsports on here, they are a trader, i got my clutch kit from them, and EXEEDY ORGANIC plate one i think its called, i have 250rwkw, and it cops lots of abuse and has held up perfectly and super easy to drive with, just a fraction firmer than stock, hardly noticeable. Cheers. Andrew.

Purpose of car is to be drivable. The current clutch is gone. I don't go to track days or drift it etc.. Just everyday driving, but it has 250rwkw.

thanks for the info for KUDO's, I will look into it.

Would prefer a preloved one just to save money on going a new clutch. Just need to get car up and running.

Cheers

Daniel

not sure ur price range but i have a near new (just run in) custom made NPC clutch kit which was built to handle 500hp with tracking and drift use in mind. never got to use it at its potential as car was stripped down. super driveable (the 33 was my daily) and firm pedal feel thats not crazy stiff like my old exedy brass. will let it go $750 firm flywheel is fully machined and all, kit is ready to go and NPC gear can be vouched by heaps as one of Australia's best clutch supplier and manufacturers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...