Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Does anyone have any idea what the standard spring rates are for an R32 (1992) Skyline GT-R? I have a set of Whiteline springs as part of the Works package for that car, but the shocks were out of stock for some time, so had the std shocks rebuilt. Unfortunately the rebuilt ones still aren't cutting it with a lot of bouncing at the front (suspension guy says it's cavetating). Here's the details of the Whiteline spring rates that I got from Whiteline:

Front (Whiteline #83157) - Linear spring : 191 lbs/in

Rear (Whiteline #70191) - Progressive : 150 - 204 lbs/in

or (based on basic conversion)

Front (Whiteline #83157) - Linear spring : 3.4kg/mm

Rear (Whiteline #70191) - Progressive : 2.7 to 3.6kg/mm

Sydneykid, I know you're pretty cluey on suspension setup, do these springs sound about right. Application will be street and some track work, with about 350-400rwhp. Car rides on 18x10's (cause I like em - http://www.ipixel.com.au/temp/p1-qf-r32gtr/) that weigh in at 7.45kg sans tyres. Getting shocks rebuilt again to hopefully clear up the handling probs, feel the shocks just aren't heavy enough for the spring rates.

Cheers

Brendan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34026-spring-rates-for-r32-gt-r/
Share on other sites

OK, managed to find out the standard spring rates for the R32 GT-R, they're as follows:

Fronts - Linear spring: 134lbs/in or 2.4kg/mm

Rears - Linear spring: 151lbs/in or 2.7kg/mm

Here's the standard shock absorber ratings - ie. damping force (at 0.3m (1.0ft)/s):

Front Extension side: 1,746N (178kg, 392lb)

Front Compression side: 500N (51, 112lb)

Rear Extension side: 1,106N (113kg, 249lb)

Rear Compression side: 402N (41, 90lb)

These measurements are taken from the R32 GT-R service manual (Australian version I presume cause it's english).

Cheers

Brendan

Hi Vspec32, as you can see they are a good, not drastic, upgrade on the standard spring rates. For circuit work, they work very well with the Whiteline stabiliser bars. I would also have the full set of bushes on my list and removeing the HICAS is a must.

You really need to do the shocks, or you going Koni or Bilstein?

Thanks for replying Sydneykid. I actually have the Works pkg sans shocks of course. So that includes a few bushes and the sway bars. Unfortunately I've just found out I'm going to have to wait for the shock guy to do another more appropriate rebuild due to family problems. For me to get the appropriate Whiteline shocks now it's going to cost over $1200, but I've paid $1K already for mine to be rebuilt : ( Suppose it's going to have to wait.

Is there a simple way of shutting down the HICAS on the GT-R, or do I need to install something like a HICAS Locking Kit (eg. Tomei). Thought I had read somewhere that it was possible to route the hydraulics back around on to itself. Also, would the subframe bushes (pineapples?) be a worthwhile addition? Was going to do it before but was advised against it due to noise (this was when the wife was driving it with a coupla kids in the back).

Cheers

Brendan

Hi VSEPC32

The noise is not a problem. I haven't noticed any increase with pineapples.

You should do a search on hicas locking, there are a few good long threads about it on here.

Hope that helps

Thanks Sydneykid, will look into the use of pineapples next time I head into the workshop. As for the HICAS, not much about what I may have read, but found plenty about the kits and the advantages. Might have to save up for that one after a decent intercooler and cam gears go in.

Appreciate all the good feedback.

Cheers

Brendan

Hi Vspec32, following are some of my previous posts on HICAS;

I believe that removing the HICAS is a good move for a couple of reasons...........

Firstly I like to be in control of the rear end via the throttle. The HICAS computer is slow and dumb, ie; it doesn't act very quickly and only has limited inputs. So it does things too late and sometimes they are the wrong things. It tries to help the rear traction by steering the wheels and this works OK, but only for as long as the car is within the traction limits of the tyre.

Secondly, rear tyres don't like to be twisted around when they are already under a lot of side load and scrambling for traction. The HICAS movement of the tyre is enough to break the contact patch on the road and the car slides. Sometimes a little, sometimes a lot. Then the HICAS tries to fix that by changing the steering angle and the whole thing starts all over again.

So, to answer your question, sometimes the HICAS adds to the oversteer and sometimes it doesn't. That's the killer, with the throttle and suspension setup, I have consistency. This gives the driver more confidence and consequently you can drive the car closer to the limits (ie; faster).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

we remove all of the HICAS stuff of our R32 road/race cars. We replace the rear rack with an billet alloy block, shaped and threaded to suit. This locks the rear wheels and stops them from steering. Just pulling the fuse will still allow some movement under load.

We remove all of the pipes, hose fittings, mounting blocks and the rear (1) and front (2) solenoids. We then take the hose that usually goes from the power steering pump to the front solenoids and re-route it so the fluid goes straight through the oil cooler pipe.

Removing all this saves almost 30 kgs (including the excess fluid) and the car handles much more predicably on the circuit and on the road. None of the GTR's circuit race cars I have seen anywhere in the world (including the Gibson ones here in Australia) ran the HICAS.

Simple HICAS bypass kits are available from people like Jun, Apexi, Tomei etc. They have a couple of washers that stop the rack from moving and an electronic box that tricks the HICAS computer into thinking the rack is still working and so the dashboard warning light doesn't come on.

There are other kits around that have a replacement for the rack and a small bypass hose that goes between the two standard hoses at the rear rack. This makes the HICAS computer think the rack is still working and so the dashboard warning light doesn't come on. Stillen make kits like this for Z32's.

There are relatively cheap solid rear rack replacements available (eg; Japanese Motorsport) but the HICAS warning light comes on when you remove all of the other stuff. Some people remove the bulb to fix this problem.

My suggestion to people when they ask about HICAS is to remove it totally cause it saves weight and the car handles better. If they don't want to go to all the trouble and expense that involves, then I tell them to use a Tomei kit. Takes under an hour to fit by an amateur with limited tools. Whatever way you do it, the car will need a wheel alignment when finished.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the Stillen rear rack replacement in billet alloy, similar to what we use on the race R32's

308550.jpg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope that helps.

I was happy with the results gained from removing the HICAS also, it does add to the turning circle a little, though.

BTW - on spring rates, does anyone know the specs for the King springs used in the GTR? I have King/Bilstein combo fitted and these are quite firm (almost too much).

Sydneykid - I also have pineapples fitted set up for traction (using the small/cut rings on the front). Do you use these in this configuation or as per all round performance (ie large rings on the front)?

Hi Gav, re Kings spring rates, that's why I use Whiteline springs.

Using the small pineapples to lower the front of the rear suspension cradle decreases the anti squat, so you get better rear end traction due to the additional weight transfer. This is a good drag set up or for people who want to decrease the oversteer a little. On the circuit we find this setup increases the corner exit understeer, so we mostly run the large rings, underneath all round.

Hope that helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...