Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello

I have a RB25 that is newer from the factory from Nissan that I will be getting. It was built with a GTSs turbo on it afterwards with head gasket and front facing plenum.

The engine is about 4 years old. Would that make it a series 2 RB25? It is not a Neo, the engine was built to put into a R33.

I need to know because it will go into my R32 gts-t and I need to know which engine harness to buy.

I have a Power FC for it. Would it be a series one or two harness?

Will I need a coil pack ignitor?

Help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/340858-rb25-series-1-or-2-engine-harness/
Share on other sites

4 yrs old????

Any way the ONLY differences between the two are the afm, tps and coil packs....pfc will work either way so work out what u have in the 3 items listed and u would know which harness to get

It was built new from Nissan. Previous owner order the engine 4 years ago.

Not sure if the afm is there. What is a tps? It has the coil packs already.

I will check for the afm. So I have to find out if I have a series 1 or 2 afm. If I do not have one, than I can choice based on what series I am going to go for?

Tps= Throttle position sensor....this is on the throttle body and are different between S1 and S2 and cannot interchange

S1 carry a green sticker on the afm that ends J60, S2 a pink sticker not sure about the no.

Does the coil pack harness go to an ignitor ie. a little black box?? As ^^^ said post a pic and we'll tell u for sure

Tps= Throttle position sensor....this is on the throttle body and are different between S1 and S2 and cannot interchange

S1 carry a green sticker on the afm that ends J60, S2 a pink sticker not sure about the no.

Does the coil pack harness go to an ignitor ie. a little black box?? As ^^^ said post a pic and we'll tell u for sure

I have to check to see if there is a coil pack harness. The person who I am getting the engine from has stuff everywhere in the other car(r34) so I have to find what he had or did not have.

I read from my previous post about rb25s into r32 that someone said I can use the rb20 wiring harness, cas, tps, coil packs, sensors, etc for the rb 25.

Which would be easier in this case? Finding all of the rb25 parts and sensors or using the sensors and things from my rb20? I know I would have to have a seperate switch for the VCT.

I want to do this without lots of trouble. I do not know what things completely he has. The person has left and I have to sort through the parts.

I have the power FC for the rb 25.

If I go the Rb25 wiring route, I have to buy the cas, tps, sensors, ac unit, etc for a rb25?

Edited by 335
Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers,

A peck of pickled peppers Peter Piper picked;

If Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers,

Where's the peck of pickled peppers Peter Piper picked

Post man post.....

ok, I will post a pic, but it will be tomorrow, the place where the car parts are is closed right now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...