Jump to content
SAU Community

Missfire.. Assumption


Recommended Posts

Well i have been doing some testing.

Currently got a slight modded R33 (read below) still running the cooler and turbo. After reading a Zoom magazine article where 0.9 spark plug gap was the best performer, much better than 0.6 that they tested as well.

Anyway, pulled my plugs out and they were gapped too 0.66 (after last dyno breakdown we closed the gap), and bumped it upto 0.9. Immediately it didnt have that idle miss, but underload down low it started missing (3000-4000) , but was very strong up top 5000+, where it didnt miss a beat. Mind you im pushing nearly 13psi too. Hmmm, so i think it is getting a little too much fuel midrange, maybe i should lean it off with my SAFC. So i dropped the boost back to around 12psi and now no miss. Also, with around 13psi im getting some pinging.

So my assumptions are:

1) If your running hi boost, close the gap, or lean it off, or retard the timing

2) Mild boost should be fine, with a larger gap, say 0.9

Now, im just about to put a Front Mount on, hopefully this is going to fix a few areas of heat

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34660-missfire-assumption/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HFM BM57 has a "bad" knee point, IIRC. It's not the same thing as the later R chassis MC.
    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
×
×
  • Create New...