Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Engine:

What are the specifications of the RB series engine?

Nissan makes engine identification easy

all those letters and numbers have meanings!

RB series of engine

20 / 25 / 26 capacity (20~1998cc / 25~2497cc / 26~2597cc)

D Double Overhead Cam (or DOHC)

E EFI (Electronic fuel injection)

T /TT Turbo / twin turbo

RB20E 97kw@5600rpm 172Nm@4400rpm

RB20DE 116kw@6400rpm 184Nm@5200rpm

RB20DET (Red top) 134kw@5600rpm 225Nm@4400rpm

RB20DET (Silver top) 160kw@6400rpm 263Nm@3200rpm

RB25DE 142kw@6400rpm 231Nm@4800rpm

RB25DET 187kw@6400rpm 295Nm@4800rpm

RB26DETT 208kw@6800rpm 368Nm@4400rpm

Basic R32 specifications:

2 Door Specification 4 Door Specification

Front Track 1460 mm

Rear Track 1460 mm

Length 4530 mm

Width 1695 mm

Height 1325 mm

Ground Clearance 145 mm

Fuel Tank 60 litres

Front Track 1460 mm

Rear Track 1460 mm

Length 4580 mm

Width 1695 mm

Height 1340 mm

Ground Clearance 145 mm

Fuel Tank 60 litres

Vehicle weights

R32 GTS 1260 kg

R32 GTS25 1380 kg

R32 GTSt 1280 kg

R32 GTS4 1480 kg

R32 GTR 1480 kg

R33 GTS25T sedan 1398 kg

NB: these weights are unconfirmed.

R32 Wheels

R32's are available with the following factory wheels:

Size Offset OEM tyres

14x5 1/2 JJ 40 mm offset

165SR14

185/70R14

15x6 JJ 40 mm offset

185/70R14

205/60R15

16x6 1/2 JJ 40 mm offset 205/55R16

16x8 JJ 30 mm offset 225/50R16

The 16x8 JJ are GT-R wheels are very hard to come by. The size of the wheel is stamped into

the rim for identification purposes.

Upgrades to tyre size can be done with differing results. Some members have reported good

results with 225 sized tyres on the GTS-t 16x6 rim, others have had excessive tire-wall

flexing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35072-skyline-engine-specs/
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Some specs on the RB20DET..

Thanks,

Abu

Engine type: RB20DET

Displacement (cc): 1998

Combustion chamber: Pent-Roof Type

Valve arrangement: DOHC Belt Drive

Bore x stroke mm: 78.0 x 69.7

Compression ratio: 8.5

Compression pressure: (kg / cm2) / (RPM) 12.0 / 300

maximum output (net) (ps / rpm): 215 / 6400

maximum torque (net) (kg-m / rpm): 27.0 / 3200

Fuel consumption ratio (g / GS.h) / (rpm): 215 / 2400

Dimensions m/t (l / w / h) (mm): 845x660x685

Dimensions a/t (l / w / h) (mm): 830x660x685

Idle speed (rpm): 800

Ignition timing a/t (BTDCdegrees / rpm): 15 / 650

Ignition timing m/t (BTDCdegrees / rpm): 20 / 650

Firing order: 1-5-3-6-2-4

Valve clearance cold (mm) intake: 0.45 +/- 0.003

Valve clearance cold (mm) exhaust: 0.38 +/- 0.003

Throttle chamber bolts torque setting (kg-m) first stage: 0.9 - 1.1

Throttle chamber bolts torque setting (kg-m) second stage: 1.8 - 2.2

Flywheel run-out limit (mm): 0.1

Con rod nut tightening stage 1 (kg-m): 2.3 - 2.9

Con rod nut tightening stage 2(kg-m): 3.9 - 4.5

Max Powe (KW/BHP): 160/214 @ 6400 RPM

Max Torque (NM/ft-lbs:) 263/194 @ 3200 RPM

Redline: 7600 RPM

Edited by abu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...