Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know what they are for......they modify the pinion angle....but how exactly are they constructed, and where exactly do they go? cos owning a 77 model line, im guesing u cant buy em, so ill have to make em.........and i dont see the point in buying r33 ones just to use as a template....but i will if i have to.......i want to go side ways

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35097-pineapples-not-the-fruity-kind/
Share on other sites

I know what they are for......they modify the pinion angle....but how exactly are they constructed, and where exactly do they go? cos owning a 77 model line, im guesing u cant buy em, so ill have to make em.........and i dont see the point in buying r33 ones just to use as a template....but i will if i have to.......i want to go side ways

Don't you mean DONUTS, the type JMS sell that are yellow in colour.

The things I know of are mounted above the rear crossmember, to help eliminate the twist/flex of the crossmember and diff.

I have an R30 and I went to NOLTEC at Thornleigh NSW and got new rear crossmember & diff support bushes made from URETHANE.

Cost me about $400.00 for 4 bushes, but they work great, makes the rear end very firm. :ghost:

  • 4 weeks later...

You mean the whiteline KCA349 Rear Subframe Align and lock kit.

this kit has several different height rings and mixing/matching these can give the desired result of standard bushes, all round performance, maximum traction and drift, this kit however only come available for the s13-14, r32-33 and 300zx.

i am sure whiteline would make a similar kit, and as ghostrider said he got some custom made, and they are the same rear end(s)

  • 3 weeks later...

yeah pineapples, the original name until some aussies at whiteline decided to nename them subframe alignment kits.

there are two pinion angle options; under subrame at front and above at rear will loosen rear, above at the front and below at the rear will give more traction (this is the desired setting for drift and circuit.)

theere are a few places which can make them up her in adelaide for under half the $400 i saw someone post.

there other even better alternatives which perform better and cost less, spun steel. if you have access to a lathe spin them up. they give way more stability under high load and eliminate tramp, only downside is the transmit more NVH. i use a combination of both.

under subrame at front and above at rear will loosen rear, above at the front and below at the rear will give more traction

Cheers...this is the info i was after......much appreciated

also...roughly how thick are they?

Cheers...this is the info i was after......much appreciated

also...roughly how thick are they?

18mm initial, 15mm installed.

front x4

70mm total diam outer

39mm inner hole diam

rear x2

80mm total diam outer

39mm inner hole diam

your skyline looks crazy, big fan. what V8 you running or transplanting. used to do some similar things earlier on. big hp 253 in 85 rodeo to tow ski boat, too much power not enough traction for a towey so replaced with stock 253. engine then graced a mark two cortina then finally ended up in my 12sec brougham which i stupidly traded on a soarer 3 yrs back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...