Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I would save the extra $1000 atleast knowing you will have brand new wheels.

Send Jesse Streeter a email to get a concrete price on TE37 18 x 9.5 +12 as i think they would be cheaper than 18 x 10.5 +15

His email is [email protected]

I would save the extra $1000 atleast knowing you will have brand new wheels.

Send Jesse Streeter a email to get a concrete price on TE37 18 x 9.5 +12 as i think they would be cheaper than 18 x 10.5 +15

His email is [email protected]

They're not. I got a quote once before and the difference is bugger all.

A lot of times when buying 2nd hand people get rubber in decent condition as well which will bring the 1k saving up a lil. And most people that can afford Rays, more than likely the rubber would be worth more than 1k or 1.5k brand new. The saving would then easily be 1.5k.

Another point to note is the waiting time for these rims can easily be couple of months. My recent quote for 18x10.5 white TE37 says the ETA date is mid of March and LMGT4 doesnt have an ETA date at all.

Another point to note is the waiting time for these rims can easily be couple of months. My recent quote for 18x10.5 white TE37 says the ETA date is mid of March and LMGT4 doesnt have an ETA date at all.

Yea i do agree i had to wait 2 months for my wheels to be made + being shipped

huh? in which size? 16"?

These are the ones my friend is trying to flog off to me

is that a crack in the last pic?

I'd be on my way to his house to pick them up if I was you.... They look great!!

Nah it just looks like a light mark

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...