Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi :action-smiley-069: I'm Timothy but call me Tim or Timi.

I own an R33 with a RB25DET in a GTS shell :ninja: and have owned it personally for almost 3 months

It was a great find for me since its registered as n/a n im still a kid on L plates people just assume its not turbo because of the 4 stub hubs/wheels so its all good.

The Skyline is still a work in progress but has had a little done to it like: exedy button clutch, forged JUN pistons, Z32 afm, APEX-i power intake pod filter, larger radiator, Blitz LM fmic, Blitz dual solenoid boost controller, Nistune piggyback chip, decat exhaust, adjustable coilovers (not 100% sure on brand, previous owner said KONI but i think there only for GTR?), screamer pipe, GReddy RS dump valve (to be fitted; need adaptor), cold air intake, APEX-i sway bars and strut bars, removed HICAS, Nismo lsd.

Heaps of cosmetics too but not really intro-worthy :D

I'd like to do heaps more to it like ecu remapping, BEE*R rev limiter, 3.5inch exhaust with twin cannons, SARD 1000cc injectors, twin bosch 044 fuel pumps, garrett t04z bb tu rbo mounted on 6 stem turbo pipe (exhaust manifold), GReddy intake manfold, GReddy top feed fuel rail, Tomei poncams etc.:turned: Not in hurry though, just want it to be completed before my P's (18yo)

Not hard to notice my car round Victoria because its has 17" Advanti Medusas on her (ew..should be on a Camry :down: but i wana spend money on performance stuff first) and Nismo "Graphics" on the doors :wacko:

But like I said: its still a work in progress :cool:

:thanks: TY for reading n i hope to learn more on sau

Tim.

BTW! how do you get those litte pics of your car under your comments/posts? eg: VSPECT has little grey R33 GTR like his under his posts :banana: and GTS-T_Sedan has little gold EVO 7..there mad as!!! :worship:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/362566-my-sau-n00b-intro-from-vic/
Share on other sites

Welcome Tim!

You certainly have more than a few bit's and piece's done to your car.

May i say, please don't forget at some point to put bigger brakes on it... this may mean a 5 stud conversion however.

Welcome again,

Shannon

I'd like to do heaps more to it like ecu remapping, BEE*R rev limiter, 3.5inch exhaust with twin cannons, SARD 1000cc injectors, twin bosch 044 fuel pumps, garrett t04z bb tu rbo mounted on 6 stem turbo pipe (exhaust manifold), GReddy intake manfold, GReddy top feed fuel rail, Tomei poncams etc.:turned: Not in hurry though, just want it to be completed before my P's (18yo)

Welcome... It's great to have grand plans...

However perhaps don't go out and build a 440rwkw / $35,000+ build right away, especially not with a N/A shell at least anyway.

I kid you not when I say it will kill you :)

Also to note, 3 points as soon as the Police pop the bonnet, something to be mindful of given it's turbo (and yes, the Police most certainly can tell just by looking at it).

Big thanks for the warm welcome so far :cheers:

I didn't want my intro to be an massive drain, just to keep it user friendly I just wrote the power wise upgrades I'd like to do :D

Bigger brakes are a must and so is a cage and other reinforcements since its going to be seeing laps and 1/4 miles (But not till I have heaps more driving expierience :laugh:) Also seats (incl. harnesses) are a required too. Already has strut/stabilizer/sway bars. Going to also do basic weight reductions and replace things with carbon fibre too.

Although I'm on my L's its not used and will never be used as a daily or in wet weather, its purely a weekender because during the week I got my mum's vx commo :teehee: lol petrol isnt cheap so commo is on gas. Once im on P's my dad will nurture the Skyline and I'll drive his Merc as well as Ninja 250 :ninja:

BTW power wise, aiming for figures around 280-300rwkw. Anything over is bonus but keeping it under 320rwkw. Shes runnin 14psi atm but want to replace turbo first (Shattering ceremic turbo blades sound really frightening :unsure: )

The build is going to last over a period of 18-24 months so there is plenty of time for learning as well as progression.

Exteriorly the car looks pretty basic apart from graphics lol, but as R31Nismoid said, its obvious is a turbo under the bonnet + massive fmic literally gives it away but side on eg: at traffic lights, all you see are 4 stud rims and blue "GT" emblem on side but it flutters/"Doses" like a mofo which also kinda gives it away :wacko:

Thnx heaps,

Tim

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...