Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey looking for a R33 s1 or s2..

Hoping for the following,

- Less than 150,000kms.

- As stock as possible (not a biggy if not).

- NO engine problems (being hopeful).

- Comes with RWC and REGO (doesnt have to be much as i will be driving back to darwin and getting NT REGO).

Max i will pay: $7500

PM me if you have something that you think I might be interested in..

cheers.

p.s. As stupid as it sounds I have a little pimped Hyundai Excel 1998 X3 and if your interested in a sporty looking, very fuel efficiant, very good condition car im willing to swap with money your way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365690-looking-for-r33/
Share on other sites

Hey mate. I'm looking for an r33 s2 myself. Sorry to burst your bubble but...r33 gtst's only go that cheap if they do have engine problems, over 150,000 k's and have no rego or rwc.

The cheapest I've seen one for is $8k. It's actually not that far down the forum list you should have a look at it. Not ire if it will meet all your criteria but it's certainly worth a look.

Like I said though, I would have a budget of more like $10-11k. That way you WILL meet all your criteria. That's my budget anyways and I'm looking for the same as you :)

Hopefully that helps mate. Good luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365690-looking-for-r33/#findComment-5835018
Share on other sites

If you don't mind putting up with a few scratches and maybe fixing some problems $7.5k will get you something for sure. But if your not hands on and you want to cruise around in something that looks good and drives good and will be reliable...it doesn't hurt to pay a little bit more money for something slot better. $9k will get you something pretty stock and in great condition :) definatly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365690-looking-for-r33/#findComment-5835721
Share on other sites

yea i think dj manix is right ive got a 95 r33 gtst 4 door model only done 77 000 kms paint work is in excellent condition its dark grey but its got a fmic, lowered suspension, high flow turbo, bosch fuel pump and full 3inc di fillipo exhaust and id prob want at least 15k for it if i was goin to sell it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365690-looking-for-r33/#findComment-5838370
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...