Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First of all when i installed it Everything is fine but the idle sits at 1.5 When my old cluster was in there it was sitting at 1G. So what i did was swap the motor on the back of the rev taco and replaced it with my old one , So now its sits at 900 at idle i mean its closer then 1.5 But anyways i just noticed the rev taco is really slow i mean i put my foot down and it lags its not responsive at ALL Id push the throttle and it sounds like it reaches 5k-rpm and drops but because its so slow it doesnt even reach 5k it gets to 3k and by that time the rev is already back to idle so it makes its way back down again. FYI my speedo cable has snapped recently as well i dont know if that will make it lag so much! IM SO FRUSTRATED I spent 350 on this cluster i dont want to throw it in the f*kN BIN ARGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! what shall i do???

The reason i swapped it in the first place is because the nismo taco used to read 1.5k when it was really 1000-1100 and when i played with the rev counter it used to be floppy as in when i lifter the needle to 3k or whatever the needle would just drop back free fall instead of slowly go down. my oem taco didnt do that used to drop down slowly. maybe i didnt push the needle backin right?

I had exactly the same problem,

Here is the fix:

firstly I would put the nismo motor on the tacho back on then:

you need to take note of the idle with your standard dash, then pull the face off and back ( from memory ) so you can get to the back of the tacho inside the dash, there is a small calibration screw on the side of it, just adjust to match old one thumbsup.gif

make sure you have very clean hands and don't leave dust and stuff inside the dash.. cotton gloves if you have them to stop finger marks, I just made sure I didn't touch the inside screen.

If its just a tacho issue that should fix it.

Edited by tricstar

I remember seeing that screw how the hell can you adjust it while its idling? anyways i think I fixed it, OMG its so fiddly, anyways it seems like the needle itself was not pushed in properly and was the reason its slow cause it was getting stuck at certain points.

Anyways when you put the needle back on the face how the hell do you know what position your meant to push it in, I actually had the car started and i pulled the needle off and pushed it back on at the right position. It was like Trial and error until i got it in the right position...

Anyways at the moment my idle taco shows 1000-1100, My power FC shows 980-1000-rpm... Is this normal?? Anyways im thinking of pulling the face off again and matching it to exactly what the power fc shows? Is that more correct then the actual taco itself?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...