Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats top stuff, where did u dig all these stuff from? I like the pics, they are classic.

Good work.

Here is some recent history,

http://history.nissan.co.jp/03_sports.html

Heres nissan museum,

http://www.nissan.co.jp/MUSEUM/TOP/index_top.html

For those who dont understand japanese (myself included), heres a site that can translate japanese to broken english..

http://babelfish.altavista.com/

  • 2 weeks later...

Prince Motor Company had an impressive model line up and a history of engineering excellence and sophisticated cars. Nissan adopted two of Prince Motors car's to their own line-up. These were the Skyline and the Gloria.

Prince brought new technical and design skills to Nissan that is reflected in the cars produced after the merger such as the C30, 510 and E10 models.

1966 was also the year that the very first Datsun Sunny arrived. The B10 model was a simple but well engineered car that was received well in both home and export markets. It provided just the right combination of comfort, performance and economy for a small car and in Japan heralded the beginning of what was to be known as the "my car" era, a time when everybody could have their own personal car. The name "Sunny" was actually chosen by the general public after Nissan ran newspaper ads inviting people to name the new model to be launched soon. Nissan received nearly eight and a half million reply postcards in a month! The name Sunny was finally chosen because it fitted the cars image of "bright, lively and youthful".

Nissan motor sport success continued with a top placings (5th and 6th) for a pair of 411 Bluebirds in the 1966 East African Safari Rally, the toughest rally in the world. Similar results came in 1967 and 1968 with the 130 Cedric's when only seven cars finished out of ninety three starters (the Cedric came 7th).

JetDat this features your model

In 1967 the 510 arrived. This was probably one of the best cars Nissan ever produced. While relatively orthodox in it's styling and general concept it, much like the B10 provided the perfect blend of performance, economy and comfort ...and all for a bargain price. The 510 was an instant success in both the USA and Australia and to a lesser degree in Europe, although it has to be said, that in Europe there was a higher number similar cars in competition with the 510.

1968_510_1300dx.jpg

Exports had reached such a level by this time that in 1967 a wharf was built at Hommoku port just for Nissan’s export vehicles. In 1968 the C30 further improved on the 510 and B10 with its rack and pinion steering and cross flow OHC engine. These three Datsuns along with the 130 Cedric heralded the beginning of Datsun imports into the United Kingdom in 1968.

Datsun came closer to the top of the leader board again in the East African Safari Rally with a 510 finishing 3rd overall and Datsuns taking six of the top thirteen places. Victory was not far away.

Nissan's Fairlady models, which had been about since the fifties, took a dramatic new direction in 1969 with the arrival of the Fairlady 240Z. Up until the Z the Fairlady had always been a convertible but now it had not only an elegant fixed head body but a powerful six cylinder engine as well as fully independent suspension. The Z was a massive success and went on to become the biggest selling sports car of all time.

Another first for Nissan came in 1970 with the introduction of their first front wheel drive production car, the Datsun Cherry E10 or 100A as it was know in some markets. The E10 combined the 988cc “A” series engine from the B10 mounted transversely over the transmission in a similar style to BMC's Mini of 1959, the main difference being that on the Datsun the engine and transmission didn't share the same oil. The E10 was an immediate success in Europe where cars of this type were already popular.

1970_e10.jpg

In 1970 a company called Tokyo Kaka merged with Nissan. Tokyo Kaka was specialists in the production and assembly of truck engines.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...