Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok guys, after searching pretty much all over the net i cannot find for the life of me a decent site apart from the gran turismo site that people have their best lap times.

not only that but the world records are only a sec apart between 1 and 50 and they are all using a wheel, i use a controller.

i dont have my info in front of me but if you are interested, fill in the following.

i think we should keep this interesting and have the following times with:

all aids off except abs on 1

and track grip on real

i always race ss tyres but whatever your times are post

track:

car:

tyres:

best lap:

controller:

maybe we can have an sau best lap times. i think if it does get some interest we keep it to ss tyres though

ill post up my times later in the day

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382046-gt5-fastest-lap-times/
Share on other sites

my fastest times

track: HIGH SPEED RING

car:

1 - gtr spec v 09 - 1:02,144

2 - mines r34 - 1:04,801

3 - r34 v spec 2 - 1:05,277

4 - 380rs spr lgr - 1:05,598

5 - rx7 spirit r 02 - 1:05,733

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-----------------------------------------------------

track: TRIAL MOUNTAIN

car:

1 - gtr spec v 09 - 1:26,388

2 - mines r34 - 1:27,908

3 - R32 v spec 2 - 1:27961

4- r34 v spec 2 - 1:28,081

5 - rx7 spirit r 02 - 1:28,644

6 - nsx type r 02 - 1:29,798

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-------------------------------------------------

track: DEEP FOREST

car:

1- mines r34 - 1:14,150

2 - r34 v spec 2 - 1:15,363

3 - r32 v spec 2 - 1:15,709

4 - rx7 spirit r 02 - 1:16,018

5 - r33 gtr v spec - 1:16,819

6 - nsx typr r 02 - 1:17,452

7 - sti 22b - 1:17,667

8 - evolution ix - 1:18,212

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-----------------------------------------------------

track: CAPE RING PERIPHERY

car:

1 - ct230 r 08 - 1:32,900

2 - mines r34 - 1:34,495

3- 380rs spr lgr - 1:34,987

4 - r32 v spec 2 - 1:36,551

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-------------------------------------------------------

track: NURBURGRING

car:

1 - mines r34 - 6:56,865

2 - r34 v spec 2 - 6:59,584

3 - 458 italia - 7:02,878

4 - r32 v spec 2 - 7:03,767

4 - 380rs spr lgr - 7:04,185

5 - sti imp spc c 04 - 7:04,850

6 - sti 10 18bbs - 7:11,435

7 - rx7 rz 00 - 7:12,150

8 - sti 07 type c - 7:14,860

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

forgot to mention, all the cars above are tuned to MAX

Edited by M.C Ren

It would be good to do a Tsukuba "time attack" comparison using stock based road cars like GTR's/RX7's/EVO's etc. tuned to within an inch of their life just like the real event.

My bests are with a controller no assists, with best parts/setups possible:

- R32 GTR 53.6s

- RX7 54.2s

More tuning might get them going around even quicker!

I'm Confused.

Aren't there leaderboards or something with all the assists listed?

*hugs Forza leaderboards with every single time, assists used and ghost to d/l to race against*

yes there are but as he mentioned, the top bazzilion times for each track are all in the same car and within less than a second of each other. far too many crazy bastards out there with far too much time.

this is a good idea for some realistic human type times. i have only and will only play with a Wheel, but it will be good to see the general comparison, will post some times next time i get on and actually have a look.

^^êxactly ^^ as for playing with a wheel, i would only play with it too if i had one, im living overseas at the moment so its enough karting my ps3 around, no way i could bring a wheel, but post up your times anyway,

ill have a crack at tsakuba, my times will generally be fully tuned examples on sports soft tyres with abs 1 as the only assist, grip is set to real also,

smithy85

not sure what tyres you where using but after reading your post im guessing racing soft. i was trying to compete on ss tyres and i had no chance hehe

your r32 gtr time is pretty good, my gtr time might have a sec in it as it was a little hard to turn in, its perfectly se up for bigger tacks so i dont want to mess around with it just to lap tsakuba.

tsakuba isnt a track i really play as i thought it wasnt that technical, but after giving it a proper shot i realise you have to be pretty precise to reel off a good time.

anyway, i took a few cars for a spin, both with sports soft and racing soft

tsakuba

1 abs only aid

grip, real

SPORT SOFT times

hks ct230r - 54.685

r34 v spec 2 - 55.811

mines r34 - 55.860

sti spec c 04 - 55.946

r32 v spec 2 - 55.956

rx7 type r - 56.501

nsx type r - 57.360

tsakuba

1 abs only aid

grip, real

RACING SOFT times

hks ct230r - 50.956

mines r34 - 52.137

r34 v spec 2 - 52.678

rx7 type r - 52.800

r32 v spec 2 - 52.846

sti spec c 04 - 53.168

nsx type r - 53.584

Owgasm, post some times up of your best laps for other cars too. I wouldn't mind buying a few different cars myself.

I'll give the vettel a shot on Suzuka, but I find it very hard to get a clean and fast time on the ds3 controller. I'll see how I go

By the way fellas, times must be clean White times, if the time goes red for crashing ect, its not valid

cranked out a few more times, tried the red bull x on sazuka and kept getting a red time, got frustrated but ill try again another day

recap on all times posted

track: HIGH SPEED RING

car:

1 - gtr spec v 09 - 1:02,144

2 - mines r34 - 1:04,801

3 - r34 v spec 2 - 1:05,277

4 - 380rs spr lgr - 1:05,598

5 - rx7 spirit r 02 - 1:05,733

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-----------------------------------------------------

track: TRIAL MOUNTAIN

car:

1 - gtr spec v 09 - 1:26,388

2 - mines r34 - 1:27,908

3 - R32 v spec 2 - 1:27961

4- r34 v spec 2 - 1:28,081

5 - rx7 spirit r 02 - 1:28,644

6 - nsx type r 02 - 1:29,798

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-------------------------------------------------

track: DEEP FOREST

car:

1- mines r34 - 1:14,150

2 - r34 v spec 2 - 1:15,363

3 - r32 v spec 2 - 1:15,709

4 - rx7 spirit r 02 - 1:16,018

5 - r33 gtr v spec - 1:16,819

6 - nsx typr r 02 - 1:17,452

7 - sti 22b - 1:17,667

8 - evolution ix - 1:18,212

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-----------------------------------------------------

track: CAPE RING PERIPHERY

car:

1 - ct230 r 08 - 1:32,900

2 - mines r34 - 1:34,495

3- 380rs spr lgr - 1:34,987

4 - r32 v spec 2 - 1:36,551

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-------------------------------------------------------

track: NURBURGRING

car:

1 - mines r34 - 6:56,865

2 - r34 v spec 2 - 6:59,584

3 - 458 italia - 7:02,878

4 - r32 v spec 2 - 7:03,767

4 - 380rs spr lgr - 7:04,185

5 - sti imp spc c 04 - 7:04,850

6 - sti 10 18bbs - 7:11,435

7 - ruf rgt 00 -7:11.773

8 - rx7 rz 00 - 7:12,150

9 - sti 07 type c - 7:14,860

tyres: all sports soft

controller: ds3

-------------------------------------------

track TSAKUBA

car -----------------------------tyres- SS -----------------RS

1 - hks ct230r --------------- 54.685---------- 50.956

2 - r35 spec v --------------- 52.933

3 - R35 07 -------------------- 53.125-------------------------------BUNTA (1 on all aids) ds3

4 - r34 v spec 2 ------------ 55.811------------52.678

5 - mines r34---------------- 55.860 ------------ 52.137

6 - sti spec c 04------------ 55.946 ------------- 53.168

7 - r32 v spec 2 ------------ 55.956 ------------ 52.846

8 - 2010 sti------------------ 56.357

9 - rx7 type r-------------- - 56.501------------ 52.800

10 - 06 bmw m3------------ 57.045

11 - amuse 380rs----------- 57.170------------53.225

12 - nsx type r---------------57.360------------ 53.584

13 - r32 gtr----------------------------------------- 53.600--------------SMITHY85

14 - rx7--------------------------------------------- 54.300---------------SMITHY85

Edited by M.C Ren

Bunta, what do you mean with one of everything? As in aids?

I reckon we keep it to

1 abs

Grip set to real

And tyres of your choice

More skill is involved

What do you guys think?

I dont have any aids on :)

I meant one of everything as in the best of all the parts you can buy for the car. I think tyres should be kept to sprts tyres jusr like the superlap even run there!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...