Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this may sound super noob but would like to find our anyway. Would like to add a boost controller on the car n would like to know if the boost hi n low will be dyno tuned? Another question is, doing controller then front mount intercooler a good way to go? Thanks heaps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385276-noob-r33-gtst-s1-question/
Share on other sites

stock r33 ecus cant be tuned and when adding high boost it will go into rich and retard and will not give u proper boost.either a remapped ecu or nistune are the cheaper options but u will also need aftermarket coil packs and regapped spark plugs for better performance.the list goes on.do a search u will find all ur answers there or go and see a reputable tuner

stock r33 ecus cant be tuned and when adding high boost it will go into rich and retard and will not give u proper boost.either a remapped ecu or nistune are the cheaper options but u will also need aftermarket coil packs and regapped spark plugs for better performance.the list goes on.do a search u will find all ur answers there or go and see a reputable tuner

that makes it sound a bit worse than it is. you can easily run 11 or 12psi safely without any issues and you will see noticable gains without needing a tune.

that makes it sound a bit worse than it is. you can easily run 11 or 12psi safely without any issues and you will see noticable gains without needing a tune.

have u seen wat happens wen u do it on a dyno?or road tune?

have u seen wat happens wen u do it on a dyno?or road tune?

yup. had my 33 running the stock ecu with a front mount cooler, cat back and running about 12psi (and the timing advanced a few degrees) and it made just over 200kw at the wheels (204kw to be exact) on a dyno and AFRs weren't that rich (no richer than at lower boost levels). a mate made 177kw from his 33 at similar boost on the same dyno, but his engine was a bit worn and it had a remapped ecu (was in the car when he bought it, so no idea what it was tuned for).

oh and i forgot to say, you only need aftermarket coils and plugs if the stock ones are cactus. my mates 33 that made 177kw, i installed a larger turbo on it and tuned the ecu he got for it and it made 250kw with the stock coils and copper spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm

yup. had my 33 running the stock ecu with a front mount cooler, cat back and running about 12psi (and the timing advanced a few degrees) and it made just over 200kw at the wheels (204kw to be exact) on a dyno and AFRs weren't that rich (no richer than at lower boost levels). a mate made 177kw from his 33 at similar boost on the same dyno, but his engine was a bit worn and it had a remapped ecu (was in the car when he bought it, so no idea what it was tuned for).

oh and i forgot to say, you only need aftermarket coils and plugs if the stock ones are cactus. my mates 33 that made 177kw, i installed a larger turbo on it and tuned the ecu he got for it and it made 250kw with the stock coils and copper spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm

thats interesting cause i asked my tuner if i could rum 11psi boost with a stock ecu,3.5" exhaust,r34 smic (im now running a fmic) and stock turbo and he said it it would go into rnr and that there are no real gains to be made.

the 204kw u made in ur r33 was it a safe tune so to speak its not goin to blow ur motor or turbo in the near future?

thats interesting cause i asked my tuner if i could rum 11psi boost with a stock ecu,3.5" exhaust,r34 smic (im now running a fmic) and stock turbo and he said it it would go into rnr and that there are no real gains to be made.

the 204kw u made in ur r33 was it a safe tune so to speak its not goin to blow ur motor or turbo in the near future?

11psi shouldn't put the car into rnr, however every car is different. most cars don't hit it until up around 13psi. this is also the limit of what is safe to run on the stock turbo without drastically shortening it's life. this is well documented on this forum. plenty of people will tell you that the stock turbo stops making power at around 12 or 13psi, but that is totally wrong. this is generally said by people who have never tried it and have simply read it on a forum (written by other people who have never tried it and simply read it on a forum too) and they take it as gospel. but i digress.

the 204kw i made in my 33 was on the stock ecu, so it was as safe as any stock ecu (safer than most aftermarket tunes). the AFR's were in the mid 10's at high rpm, so plenty of head room if it started to lean out. it was on the verge of hitting rnr though as there were 2 slight dips on the graph. i'd had to back the boost down by about 1psi on the way to the dyno as it had hit rnr. as for blowing the motor, the stock motor is safe at 200kw. the general concensus is that 300kw is the upper limit of the stock motor (you can make more power than that on the stock motor but it won't last long). it was the upper limit of what's safe for the stock turbo though. having said that i got a hold of a remapped ecu without rnr and was running 14/15psi for about a year with no problems. never had it on the dyno with that ecu (had checked the AFR's with a mates wideband though and they were safe). definitely had more power though. one day i wound the boost back down to 11psi and put the stock ecu back in and it felt much slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've seen similar actually in my situation. You never know what tables are attempted to be used when the car thinks it's -99C or +200C. The fail state is not usually that extreme but you know what I mean - it was in my case though! This is where being able to read all the sensors is useful cause you see this stuff really quickly.
    • The above is very important. However as long as you keep timing relatively low, it's plausible to make your own knock ears and plausible to learn to tune with a modern ECU that can do wideband O2 correction like a boost controller. I mean if you only have one viable road to even drive the car on, learning to tinker to this level may be worth doing given you can't do much else with the car...?
    • I find the fact that the rear plate has to be bent inwards at the rear not so bad: but the front is just awful: It's like come on. (these are my very old, now retired/turned in plates) TBH it is a lot of money to fix a minor issue, the fact I said "I'll never really spend the money on doing this" is why people ended up buying them as a gift for a 'car guy' who can be hard to shop for.. for car guy things.
    • I just bent the ends of my premo plates. It even went through Regency like that after the engine conversion and the inspector (a great bloke!) just squinted his eyes and said "I didn't see that". Plates, and how they look, are just something that have zero importance to me.
    • Yeah, I would have said the same. It makes me suggest that there are other things wrong, such that the ECU is totally unhappy with the broken sensor. The only other thought here is that maybe it is shorted, which might cause a different issue to the typical "disconnected" sensor.
×
×
  • Create New...