Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this may sound super noob but would like to find our anyway. Would like to add a boost controller on the car n would like to know if the boost hi n low will be dyno tuned? Another question is, doing controller then front mount intercooler a good way to go? Thanks heaps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385276-noob-r33-gtst-s1-question/
Share on other sites

stock r33 ecus cant be tuned and when adding high boost it will go into rich and retard and will not give u proper boost.either a remapped ecu or nistune are the cheaper options but u will also need aftermarket coil packs and regapped spark plugs for better performance.the list goes on.do a search u will find all ur answers there or go and see a reputable tuner

stock r33 ecus cant be tuned and when adding high boost it will go into rich and retard and will not give u proper boost.either a remapped ecu or nistune are the cheaper options but u will also need aftermarket coil packs and regapped spark plugs for better performance.the list goes on.do a search u will find all ur answers there or go and see a reputable tuner

that makes it sound a bit worse than it is. you can easily run 11 or 12psi safely without any issues and you will see noticable gains without needing a tune.

that makes it sound a bit worse than it is. you can easily run 11 or 12psi safely without any issues and you will see noticable gains without needing a tune.

have u seen wat happens wen u do it on a dyno?or road tune?

have u seen wat happens wen u do it on a dyno?or road tune?

yup. had my 33 running the stock ecu with a front mount cooler, cat back and running about 12psi (and the timing advanced a few degrees) and it made just over 200kw at the wheels (204kw to be exact) on a dyno and AFRs weren't that rich (no richer than at lower boost levels). a mate made 177kw from his 33 at similar boost on the same dyno, but his engine was a bit worn and it had a remapped ecu (was in the car when he bought it, so no idea what it was tuned for).

oh and i forgot to say, you only need aftermarket coils and plugs if the stock ones are cactus. my mates 33 that made 177kw, i installed a larger turbo on it and tuned the ecu he got for it and it made 250kw with the stock coils and copper spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm

yup. had my 33 running the stock ecu with a front mount cooler, cat back and running about 12psi (and the timing advanced a few degrees) and it made just over 200kw at the wheels (204kw to be exact) on a dyno and AFRs weren't that rich (no richer than at lower boost levels). a mate made 177kw from his 33 at similar boost on the same dyno, but his engine was a bit worn and it had a remapped ecu (was in the car when he bought it, so no idea what it was tuned for).

oh and i forgot to say, you only need aftermarket coils and plugs if the stock ones are cactus. my mates 33 that made 177kw, i installed a larger turbo on it and tuned the ecu he got for it and it made 250kw with the stock coils and copper spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm

thats interesting cause i asked my tuner if i could rum 11psi boost with a stock ecu,3.5" exhaust,r34 smic (im now running a fmic) and stock turbo and he said it it would go into rnr and that there are no real gains to be made.

the 204kw u made in ur r33 was it a safe tune so to speak its not goin to blow ur motor or turbo in the near future?

thats interesting cause i asked my tuner if i could rum 11psi boost with a stock ecu,3.5" exhaust,r34 smic (im now running a fmic) and stock turbo and he said it it would go into rnr and that there are no real gains to be made.

the 204kw u made in ur r33 was it a safe tune so to speak its not goin to blow ur motor or turbo in the near future?

11psi shouldn't put the car into rnr, however every car is different. most cars don't hit it until up around 13psi. this is also the limit of what is safe to run on the stock turbo without drastically shortening it's life. this is well documented on this forum. plenty of people will tell you that the stock turbo stops making power at around 12 or 13psi, but that is totally wrong. this is generally said by people who have never tried it and have simply read it on a forum (written by other people who have never tried it and simply read it on a forum too) and they take it as gospel. but i digress.

the 204kw i made in my 33 was on the stock ecu, so it was as safe as any stock ecu (safer than most aftermarket tunes). the AFR's were in the mid 10's at high rpm, so plenty of head room if it started to lean out. it was on the verge of hitting rnr though as there were 2 slight dips on the graph. i'd had to back the boost down by about 1psi on the way to the dyno as it had hit rnr. as for blowing the motor, the stock motor is safe at 200kw. the general concensus is that 300kw is the upper limit of the stock motor (you can make more power than that on the stock motor but it won't last long). it was the upper limit of what's safe for the stock turbo though. having said that i got a hold of a remapped ecu without rnr and was running 14/15psi for about a year with no problems. never had it on the dyno with that ecu (had checked the AFR's with a mates wideband though and they were safe). definitely had more power though. one day i wound the boost back down to 11psi and put the stock ecu back in and it felt much slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...