Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just go to your local exhaust shop and ask them what extractors they can get.

oh and FYI, extractors won't do much for fuel economy. in a lot of cases they will do bugger all, or make it worse. they generally only make a difference to power at the higher end of the rev range, at the expense of a bit of low end.

it may be worth looking at other, cheaper things to try and improve fuel economy. check your o2 sensor, clean your AFM, take note of how long the car takes to warm up (if it takes more than 5 mins or a few kms of driving to warm up, or doesn't warm up to the middle of the gauge, then the thermostat is shot and replacing it will improve your economy) and most importantly, examine your driving style. if you floor it everytime you take off then you aren't helping the situation.

it's also worth pointing out that spending a few hundred dollars to TRY and get better economy is somewhat counter productive. lets say for example that you spend $300 on extractors and it only gives you a 10% increase in economy (which is a reasonable figure), you will only save $3 a week, so it will take you nearly 2 years before you have saved enough to pay for the extractors. what sort of economy are you getting?

ive cleaned both, run a high flow filter and cold air intake,, and 5w 30 oil, thinest that is practical to run, drive it like a granny, and im not nesacerally after the money back id just like to make the lack of power more liveable and keep the same economy if not improve it, after all number to is crushed to allow number three to run on the standard manifold, and i was more after recomendations for brands, sorry for not clarifying

most major brands are all reasonable quality. if you talk to enough people you will hear that every brand is crap, and that every brand is great. you are actually best looking on a lancer forum and seeing what they recommend. what brand works well on one car might not work as another brand on another car, so any advice you get from what works well on a skyline might not be true for on a lancer.

i've used genie and pacemaker headers with no issues in the past.

i should also note that there are certain cars where aftermarket headers make next to no difference in power. v6 magnas are a great example of this. the reason being that the cams are a bigger restriction than the headers. so gains will be minimal. having said that, on something like a SSS pulsar they make a big difference. also i've driven a lancer and they aren't that bad of a car power wise. maybe yours has a bigger issue, such as low compression or a dodgy fuel pump or clogged injectors (which a bottle of injector cleaner won't fix), or possibly even a blocked cat. not trying to talk you out of getting headers, just don't want you to be let down by the possible lack of gains if there is something else going on.

i have been tossing up those options of dirty/blocked parts, as it was driven extremely sedately when my mother owned it and runs better when it gets a bit of a rev or run injector cleaner through it, how would i go about cleaning these items

i should also note that there are certain cars where aftermarket headers make next to no difference in power. v6 magnas are a great example of this. the reason being that the cams are a bigger restriction than the headers. so gains will be minimal. .

At the risk of derailing this thread, and admitting that I was once a Magna tragic, I have to ask whether you tried the muffler upgrade? At the time I had my TH, the word on the street was that the rear muffler was a fairly m,ajor source of restriction, and replacing it with a bigger (not necessarily a ricey fart cannon) made a reasonable difference (around 10-12kW IIRC in the 3.5 TH). Never ended up changing mine (couldn't see the sense in hotting up a Magna) but there seemed to be a few people claiming it made a reasonable difference. Interesting to hear about the extractors though. At the time I got mine (early 2000) there weren't any off the shelf units, and my exhaust guy offered to make a set of stainless extractors for $500. Again, I couldn't justify spoending those $$ on the boat.

Normal programming will resume now.

Possibly - as Marc said it comes down to each car's areas of weakness. In the case of the Magna, the rear muffler was quite restrictive to keep them quiet (at the time they were reknowned for very low NVH levels compared to other cars in the class). If you're going for a less restrictive muffler, then larger volume tends to help keep the noise down while still flowing OK. Juet be careful you don't end up with something droney. Talk to the Lancer guys to find out what results others have had (just be prepared to wade through the stories of how a canon and shiny 4" exhaust turned a stock lancer into a GTR killah)

At any rate, I think on a 1.8 lancer, any exhaust changes will only have a marginal effect, and the benefits (if any) will most likely only be there at higher revs (ie peak power where flow will be highest), not for normaly day to day driving.

What do you fill up with? And what kind of economy are we talking about here? Auto or manual?

I have a daily Mazda 323, it's a 1.8. Manual. Filled up last night, and calculated 6.7 litres per 100 km. that's comuting, but being holidays traffic isn't bad. I use 95 at the pump, and have increased the static timing to compensate, to the point where I don't have pre det. I also removed the centre muffler, not cause full hectic, but cause it was forever leaking. Made nil difference in econ.

Also noticed you live in tassie. Roads can be pretty mountainous round those parts, so factor that into your economy. Other things that come to mind, do you do lost of short trips? That increases fuel use. Check your idle is within manufacturers stds, adjust if needed. Other than that, what Marc said about afm and O2 sensor.

At the risk of derailing this thread, and admitting that I was once a Magna tragic, I have to ask whether you tried the muffler upgrade? At the time I had my TH, the word on the street was that the rear muffler was a fairly m,ajor source of restriction, and replacing it with a bigger (not necessarily a ricey fart cannon) made a reasonable difference (around 10-12kW IIRC in the 3.5 TH). Never ended up changing mine (couldn't see the sense in hotting up a Magna) but there seemed to be a few people claiming it made a reasonable difference. Interesting to hear about the extractors though. At the time I got mine (early 2000) there weren't any off the shelf units, and my exhaust guy offered to make a set of stainless extractors for $500. Again, I couldn't justify spoending those $$ on the boat.

Normal programming will resume now.

yeah i did. mine was also a TH and i put a lukey rear muffler on and it made a difference. then i put a redback mid section on and it made a difference too. extractors did bugger all though. and yeah, up to around 10kw is pretty much spot on.

on average on good 91 i'll get 7-8ish per hundred, 6.5 if i get a really good batch of fuel, its manual, and its i have been tossing up that the timings out cause it does run a little rich, i've checked plug gap etc so

that is pretty darn good economy. you won't get much better than that. the best i've ever gotten out of the missus SSS is 6.5L/100kms on the highway (generally around the 7 to 8L/100kms on the highway. round town i generally get 10 to 11L/100kms out of it (and about 14L/100kms out of my vt wagon around town and 9L/100kms on the highway), but that is a lot of short trips (so car runs on cold start enrichment most of the time) and stop/start driving, so poor economy is to be expected.

if you do extractors then you would want to do a cat back exhaust to make the most of it. the power gains from doing this would be in the range of 5 to 10kw, but that will be more at the top end of the rev range. the low to mid range won't increase much, or may even drop a little bit in the lower rev range.

it really does sound like you have unrealistic expectations from a 4 cylinder car though. as i said in an earlier post, i've driven a 1.8L lancer and they aren't bad to drive as far as power goes. sure the don't have the low down pull of a larger motor, but they are far from lacking (unless there is a mechanical issue, but from your fuel economy i don't think there is). any mods you do to increase power will only gain you about 10% more power, most of it at the higher end of the rev range. so not really the sort of change that it sounds like you are after. about the only thing that would give you the sort of low to mid range power gains is bolting a turbo to it.

I have never heard of anyone going backwards with extractors, unless you were to fit ones that didnt suit the particular motor (i,e overly large primaries etc). might not give a huge increase in power but should make the motor considerably more efficient.

Pacemaker do a 4 into 1 set for about 400 bucks.

OP: stop thrashing the shit out of it!

BTW the thought of modding a Magna is laughable. Worst aussie family car i've driven, i'd rather get around in a VN!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...