Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yellow jackets coil packs lesd than 5000ks old $450

550Cc injectors high flows with rail $550

Emanage ultimate with software. With tune for 245rwkw on low boost 14-15 psi with a 3076R $500 and a mines chipped stag computer $250

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388738-s1-c34-upgrade-goodies/
Share on other sites

Emanage sold . coil packs sold pending payment.

injectors still avalible, as is a MV Autos shift kitted trans and B&M trans cooler with thermo fan and thermatic switch .

Mines factory chipped. so boost cut rev limiter speed limiter removed some times extra fuel /air depending on what was ordered you can chase what was done by the individual numbers on the gold mines plaque

Yeah but its none tuneable its just chipped the way it is i had an emanage piggy backed on it guess its more of a jap w@#k factor than anything

  On 31/01/2012 at 11:07 AM, 4bidn1 said:

Yeah but its none tuneable its just chipped the way it is i had an emanage piggy backed on it guess its more of a jap w@#k factor than anything

Haha ok. yer prob the same as what a safc neo and removing the boost cut could do.

I was thinking emanage but no 1 in Perth can and will tune them.

Any how changing to R motor soon as i get all i need. Not in a hurry to do it at the moment that's why i looking for some small bits to make the 25 a bit better

Emanage sold

coil packs sold

550cc highflow injectors still avalible $400

S1 mv shift kitted and serviced auro trans 315 kw rating all recipts $450 ono (you cant even get the shift kit fitted for that much)i

S2 rear corner tail lights pair $100

S1 rs4 front mesh grill with rs badge $100

stagra tein coil overs front no leaks damper adjustable $200.

R34 neo standard turbo good condition $250

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...