Jump to content
SAU Community

Fs 94/95 Gts-t

RON-15H
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr Rb20 Community Regular

Mr Rb20

Posted
Posted

Don't let me detract from your sale, this is a very nice car, i looked at the website.

Correct me if i am wrong, but, according to the dyno chart, that power output was made at 25psi at a theoretical speed of 185km/h.

That would explain the big power output from such limited mods.

Is that an aftermarket sunroof too ??

All in all, good car for the money, good luck with the sale.

Metro Rookie

Metro

Posted
Posted

Mr Rb20 No dude. See how there is 2 black lines and 2 red lines, one set of lines is for how many kw and for how much boost is running at that time. The red lines read 185kws at 8 psi and the black reads 201kw at 12psi. Also see as the car gets to 201kw the boost that its running drops down close to 10psi, wich is natural for it to do.

RON-15H Proficient

RON-15H

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Don't let me detract from your sale, this is a very nice car, i looked at the website.

Correct me if i am wrong, but, according to the dyno chart, that power output was made at 25psi at a theoretical speed of 185km/h.

That would explain the big power output from such limited mods.

Is that an aftermarket sunroof too ??

All in all, good car for the money, good luck with the sale.

Hell NO 25psi, my turbo would have been out the exhuast at that much psi dude...

This is a standard turbo and computer not even a SAFC no bullshit with a proper upgrade front mount with exhaust at max 13psi producing 201kw.

GT-R32 Grand Master

GT-R32

Posted
Posted

Fair enough. That's were the big power comes from then, shoot out mode reads a lot higher than tune. It's supposed to be for 'shoot outs' (duh) and consistent across different dynos, but people change setttings etc. and it makes it unconsistent which makes it hard to say how much power it really produces... that said a mate of mine had his VK 308 dyno'd in shoot out mode and it put down 158rwkws which would be very close to engine power not rear wheel power. Nice car mate anyways mate, still interested in it. Could you please send pics to my email? [email protected]

Just I can't see them here. It's blocked on my end.

RON-15H Proficient

RON-15H

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ALT 18" WITH 265 AT THE REAR 245 AT THE FRONT.

MY PRICE IS NOT INCREASING....I JUST DONE SOME RESEARCH ON THE NET AND I REALISED THE PRICE THAT I WAS ASKING FOR IS A BIT LOW WITH ALL MY MODS, ACCESSORIES AND CONDITION OF THE CAR SO I DECIDED TO BUMP IT UP 1g

Jigga Explorer

Jigga

Posted
Posted

don't you know skylines appreciate with time......jus wait till u actually go and see the car he'll probably jack it up more..... its a collectors model with extra high head rest adjustment :usuck: and its also gts-t now how rare are they these days be quick boys jus been valued by nissan they sounded really keen on it!!!

siksII Grand Master

siksII

Posted
Posted

u guys who are saying 201 is really high, well dynos are really meant for tuning, and its well known that figures vary a lot between dynos, so u cant say 201 is too high, because in that case, why is it too high? where is your control point?

just as a guide (not to take away from how powerful the car may be...)

most people say that a gts-t with just a cat back is good for about 130rwkw.. well at the place that ron15h had his dyno done, (unigroup if im not mistaken) they say that most near stock gts-ts produce around 145-155 rwkw.

i got my car dynoed there.. 96 gts-t with in box filter, and (resrictive because of defect) cat back exhaust. the figure was 165rwkw..

so you could say that this car for sale is capable of producing around 20% more power than stock. this would be an easier way to measure things up rather than dyno figures from all over the place :(

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      GTR R34 Limp Mode

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • steven7270
      GTR R34 Limp Mode

      By steven7270 · Posted

      So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      SAUNSW - Cruise - Albion Park Aviation Museum - 9th August

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • PranK
      Rusty roof repair

      By PranK · Posted

      Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • GTSBoy
      Rusty roof repair

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...