Jump to content
SAU Community

Fitted my Xenons (pix included!)

T0nyGTSt

By T0nyGTSt,
in General Automotive Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

T0nyGTSt Grand Master

T0nyGTSt

Posted
Posted

Long story...

Here's three pics:

http://www.nitroware.net/~tony/xenon1.jpg

http://www.nitroware.net/~tony/xenon2.jpg

http://www.nitroware.net/~tony/xenon3.jpg

Bright as fark... one to two second start time.

Guy who fitted them is a legend.

I'm happy that they're very stock looking.

T.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39212-fitted-my-xenons-pix-included/
Share on other sites
rs73 Grand Master

rs73

Posted
Posted

There is another thread in here explaining why the higher the temp (K) number doesn't always better. Between 4-6000K should be used for the street, anything above that would only create a blue ray that gives fatique to eye, gives a too abrupt cut off transition from the illuminated area, and can be dazzling other road users - thus very very illegal.

uneekwahn Grand Master

uneekwahn

Posted
Posted

to retro fit a car with xenons that did not come standard with xenons requires an autoleveling function and an autocleaning function.

I can't think of the ADR's off the top off my head, but I have an ADR CD here, and it goes into it in detail.

uneekwahn Grand Master

uneekwahn

Posted
Posted

jtir: I don't know if any included autolevelling oem style.

to fit series 3 xenons costs quite a bit from what I'm aware. easiest way is to get a conversion kit, such as tonygtst and I have done.

Costs range from $300 (second hand) to $1800 (philips new release) and fitting is fairly easy.

Zagan Collaborator

Zagan

Posted
Posted

4,000K to 5,000K will give off a some what reddish light it's below normal daylight kelvin.

6,500K is daylight ie the sun.

Above that is going to be more bluer, blue light travels the further than any other light spectrum so you could expect the bluer lights to go further but you'd also end up with a blue light so a blue light might not always be the best when driving.

An example would be the sky, it's not really blue it has no colour the only reason why it looks blue is that blue travels the best through the ozone layer, and doesn't get cut as much as the other colour spectrums.

Maxx Veteran

Maxx

Posted
Posted
S3 GT-R xenons are very expensive, rare and don't fit the GTS.

Many stock cars do no have autolevel/clean and they have much more annoying blue ting'ing than good AM kits.

I'd be surprised if I'm pull over for this.

T.

the s3 GTR headlight WILL fit S1 gts-t, but i think they worth at least 2k per pair

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • AnimalGarage
      spot the stagea

      By AnimalGarage · Posted

      It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...