Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I'm looking to add some Camber arms to the V, with a fair bit of camber available adjustment.

Being that I know sweet fa about the geometry and available products, has anyone used or know about SPL, SPC, Cusco, Hardrace, Megan (or others)? Any knocking in the wells, issues with fractures etc? Ichiba/Godspeed seem to be the ones to avoid, so not considering them.

Looking at:

Front upper control arms

Rear Camber arms (upper/lower?)

Toe bolts?

Appreciate any assistance / advice

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400260-camber-kit-options/
Share on other sites

Im running SPC front/rear camber arms and toe bolts. haven't had any issues with them. The front arms require you to reuse the ball joint seat though(the cone shaped black piece on the end of the A arm) mine didn't come off so i ended up ordering a new pair.

Im not running a whole lot of camber but its better then stock, i think my rears are around 2.0 and front 1.5 degrees.

Yeah they are the best for sure Big... NASA parts. Easy way to drop $1k on camber though... for front and rears.

Only reasons holding me back on SPL is the available camber range (they seemed lower than others, more for track correction I think) and the geometry (cant confirm if they knock when lowered this much, I'm flat on the lower rings all around)

SPC fronts are similar in design to the others (not SPL), but have poly bushings (not rubber) and put less stress directly on the weld seams (+1 internetz) Maybe I'll do the brake upgrade before I tackle camber. OEM Brembos for sale soon :)

CZP site is perfect, thanks for that one!

Big, change your photo man, gimme some new headlight action!

  • 2 weeks later...

Yo Andrew,

Check your welcome post on ZClub. If you're only gonna get the camber kits then better to go through CZP yourself, however if you buying a lot of stuff best to talk to Paul. I've been eyeing the Akebono BBK for a while now, I want it! :)

Edited by 81gSKy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...