Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does anyone out there know for a fact the point where you should be looking at an aftermarket master cylinder etc because of bigger brakes.

Say if you were to run big ass 6 pots on the front, with big ass 4 pots in the rears (std Nissan 4 pots - possibly aftermarket 4 pots) with something like 355 front rotors and 324 rears.

Im expecting for such an over engineered braking setup you would need to do somthething about the std Nissan mater cylinder, perhaps bigger piston AP type setup or equiv? Std Brake booster ????

I know in a RWD car that weighs 1400kg this sort of system isnt warranted but im askign all the same. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40164-overkill-brake-setup-question/
Share on other sites

I have friends who have done an r33 front brake swap onto a silvia/180 and found that by using the original master cylinder thay have a very spongy feeling pedal but the car stops ok. They have then installed an s14 master cylinder and booster as the s14 has 4 pot fronts and similar rears and the pedal feel improved, probably improved the bias too.

In all honesty i'd think that if you are changing one component in the system so dramatically then the others should be changed as well to make the most of it, otherwise you won't get the most of the new calipers. Bias is something important in all of this too.

Yeh i expect to have to play with bias, and i seem to recall the R32 has a 32mm diam piston in master cylinder.

Whilst that std 32mm piston does a fine job at moving the std brakes 12 pistons within the std calipers (2 x 4pot fronts and 2 x 2 pot rears) i would expect it to run into trouble when expected to displace 20 pistons, may of which are a larger diam then std caliper pistons (ie 2 x6 pot fronts and 2 x 4pot rears)

Looking at some engine bays of Jap cars with massive brake upgrades (time attack or whatever they call them), many still seem to run std master cylinder setups etc, doesnt seem right to me... just wondering where the limits are, especiually since you look under the bonnet at circuits around the traps on circuit cars, and some/many run aftermarket setups when the calipers themsleves may not be dramatically different to std, ie a late model WRX with AP 6 piston fronts and std 2 pot rears?

this sounds reasonable, but in my limited understanding of physics, isnt pressure distributed evenly over all area in fluid? so the number of pots would not be so relevant as the size of the piston itself, the pressure exerted on the pistons would be the same? does this make sense?

Then again, theory and the real world often seem to clash:)

I have seen vacuum bottles fitted to brake boosters - this was mainly because of the lack of vacuum at low revs due to large cams, but I suppose theoretically extra vacuum would be beneficial?

sorry for the red herring.

??? I dont know, as for the pressure being equal you are right, but thing to remember is if you increase the volume of fluid in the brake lines, then only have the same displacement of the piston in the master cylinder, then the overall pressure applied will be reduced due to the increased volume of fluid in the system, you may need a 40mm piston to get the same percentage in volume change... make sense? (Actually its not really a volume change, more a displacement of volume...as the brake fluid isnt compressible.)

a drip under pressure!!!

???  I dont know, as for the pressure being equal you are right, but thing to remember is if you increase the volume of fluid in the brake lines, then only have the same displacement of the piston in the master cylinder, then the overall pressure applied will be reduced due to the increased volume of fluid in the system, you may need a 40mm piston to get the same percentage in volume change... make sense?  (Actually its not really a volume change, more a displacement of volume...as the brake fluid isnt compressible.)

You need help Roy, and unfortunately the people who know enough to stop you slamming into a wall will want to charge you for it...

Find out your nearest brake guru, and you will find your answer. What you pay in quality advise, deduct from your T & E bill and you'll more than likely brake(sic) square.

TT

a drip under pressure!!!

You need help Roy, and unfortunately the people who know enough to stop you slamming into a wall will want to charge you for it...

Find out your nearest brake guru, and you will find your answer. What you pay in quality advise, deduct from your T & E bill and you'll more than likely brake(sic) square.

TT

The brake kit i was looking at getting ended up selling for a grand more then i was willing to pay, so for the moment brakes are fine...will have to see how they handle the big stops at Sandown at the end of the month, sonce now i have a bit more power then before and no speed limiter.

The brake kit i was looking at getting ended up selling for a grand more then i was willing to pay, so for the moment brakes are fine...will have to see how they handle the big stops at Sandown at the end of the month, sonce now i have a bit more power then before and no speed limiter.

What is the event Roy? I have 200litres of elf I need to use...

TT

MSCA Multiclub Sprint on 30th May @ Sandown www.cm510.com/msca/

OR

PIARC are holding a sprint weekend at the Phillip Island on the 29th/30th. www.piarc.com.au

Im thinking Sandown, because its closer, a few other Vic guys ive met are going, and i want to scare myself stupid on the back straight kink.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
    • Yes then it will turn on but I want the car features to work  
    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
×
×
  • Create New...