Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R33's are heavier, longer & sit higher stock in comparison to the r32 (I like R33's over 32's by the way)

The r34 is slightly smaller & not as wide as the r33 but the difference is minimal

it's the colour of the r33 in that pic that makes it appear smaller by comparison imo, plus they aren't all factory stock examples in that photo except *maybe* the r34 & r35 so rims coilovers & tyres sizes are all unknown variables

All those myths have been busted, r33 has better power to weight ratio than the 32 in all models. The only thing the 32 has more of is arse fat. The 34 in narrower, taller and longer than the 33 (how that = looks better dunno) its Lego block like dimensions are "too square"

Just look at the picture.... It has all the answers, it does not lie.

Edited by madbung

All those myths have been busted, r33 has better power to weight ratio than the 32 in all models. The only thing the 32 has more of is arse fat. The 34 in narrower, taller and longer than the 33 (how that = looks better dunno) its Lego block like dimensions are "too square"

Just look at the picture.... It has all the answers, it does not lie.

I'm just talking pure dimensions

R33 has heavier kerb weight compared to r32, not sure about 34 weight but it's definitely smaller in measurements (& shorter too) compared to r33 but again the difference is not by much, my comment was in regards to size not power/weight ratio etc.

the r33 in that pic sits too low to be stock & dark colours on objects in general always make them 'appear' smaller.

That being said I've always had a soft spot for the r33 gtr, & my first car was an r33 gtst :)

Good for you yoyo...

R33 gts-t

Exterior length 4640mm

Exterior width 1720mm

Exterior height 1340mm

Interior length 820mm

Interior width 1415mm

Interior height 1090mm

Wheelbase 2720mm

Front track 1480mm

Rear track 1460mm

Ground clearance 145mm

Weight 1390kg

R34 gtt

Wheelbase 2,665 mm (104.9 in)

Length 4,705 mm (185.2 in)

Width 1,725 mm (67.9 in)

Height 1,375 mm (54.1 in)

Curb weight 1,410 kg (3,108.5 lb) (GT-T)

I'm in a fact slapping mood.... whats next?

v36 drivers duntrustem!

Edited by madbung

Oh you wanna play that game huh?

R32 gtr

Exterior Dimensions Base V-Spec Length [in. (cm)]: 178.9 (4,545) 178.9 (4,545) Width [in. (cm)]: 69.1 (1,755) 69.1 (1,755) Height [in. (cm)]: 52.8 (1,340) 53.3 (1,355) Wheelbase [in. (cm)]: 103.0 (2,615) 103.0 (2,615)

r33GTR

Exterior Dimensions Base V-Spec Length [in. (cm)]: 184.1 (4,675) 184.1 (4,675) Width [in. (cm)]: 70.1 (1,780) 70.1 (1,780) Height [in. (cm)]: 53.5 (1,360) 53.5 (1,360) Wheelbase [in. (cm)]: 107.1 (2,720) 107.1 (2,720)

R34 GTR

Exterior Dimensions Base V-Spec Length [in. (cm)]: 181.1 (4,600) 181.1 (4,600) Width [in. (cm)]: 70.3 (1,785) 70.3 (1,785) Height [in. (cm)]: 53.5 (1,360) 53.5 (1,360)

http://www.jbskyline.net/r32/gtr/specs/

http://www.jbskyline.net/r33/gtr/specs/

http://www.jbskyline.net/r34/gtr/specs/

This has gone way off topic

I was only discussing GTR models as the picture posted earlier were all gtr's but since you mentioned the r33gtst & r34gtt

I've owned both & the r33 was definitely longer

R33:

Exterior (L x W x H) 4640 x 1720 x 1340 (coupe) http://www.japanesesportcars.com/skyline/specs/r33_gts25tm.php

R34:

Exterior (L x W x H) 4580 x 1725 x 1340 (coupe) http://www.japanesesportcars.com/skyline/specs/r34_ggt_turbo.php

All those myths have been busted, r33 has better power to weight ratio than the 32 in all models. The only thing the 32 has more of is arse fat. The 34 in narrower, taller and longer than the 33 (how that = looks better dunno) its Lego block like dimensions are "too square"

Just look at the picture.... It has all the answers, it does not lie.

power to weight...

r32 gtr lighter than r33...

both have 206kw....

which would have better power to weight?

Op isn't talking about buying a gtr, he mentioned gtst & gtt

Try be ot It's a welcome thread ;)

The pic was for the box on wheels and Volvo jks ... That's how the boatpeople get some back.

Op isn't talking about buying a gtr, he mentioned gtst & gtt

Try be ot It's a welcome thread ;)

The pic was for the box on wheels and Volvo jks ... That's how the boatpeople get some back.

Try be ot It's a welcome thread ;)

The pic was for the box on wheels and Volvo jks ... That's how the boatpeople get some back.

The pic was for the box on wheels and Volvo jks ... That's how the boatpeople get some back.

That's how the boatpeople get some back.

That's how the boatpeople

the boatpeople

nizlM.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...