Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

As above title says hoping to tune my series 2 gtst. Reason for 95ron is simply due to the fact my fuel card is limited to that type (free fuel) and only at shell. I'm aware power won't be the most I could be getting out the car, but are there any further implications relating to; engine life, increased knock, or any other major detrimental problems that could occur going the 95 tune? Is it worth saving all that coin... rather than just paying for the 98?

THe mods I'm running are:

-Garrret 2871r

-Z32 AFM

-Greedy emange ebc

-Boch 044 fuel pump

- TBE

-Pod

-Splite-fire coil packs

-HDI Front Mount

Thanks in advance :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/415752-r33-gtst-tune-on-95ron-opinions/
Share on other sites

I don't know a whole lot about tuning but I believe they will have to pull timing so at least off boost it will be doughy how bad that will be i have no idea.

If your on stock injectors you will only be looking at 220rwkw's or thereabouts before they top out anyway so should be ok would be kind of interesting to see how it performs

You wont have any problems with the car running on 95 as long as its tuned correctly, but you'll notice a big big power drop, you want be able to run anywhere near as much timing, I can only imagine you'll loose alot of torque aswell. These engines were really designed for 100ron jap fuel so even 98 is a compromise at best.

Engine knock shouldn't be an issue if its tuned correctly for 95, any tuner who knows what there doing will allow a safety margin so it never knocks.

I think the question is why even bother running it on 95, if your fuel card is only for 95 then buy a daily and use the fuel card on that, I personally wouldn't spend money getting a car tuned for 95.

Thanks for the replies. Injectors, yes another aspect I need to consider! Any recommendations for a quick bolt on, easy fit option? Iv got the company Car which I drive to and from work only. Which probably would only accommodate 20% of my driving. Rather lose a bit of power and put fuel money to tyres more mods... Or consult the boss for a 98 upgrade. Either way will post up results :)

It's also the inconsistent nature of 95. The tune has to be extra conservative as 91/95 isn't really the best at all. From what I've read the quality varies more than it does with a 98 which is essentially the flagship petrol etc given cars that are standard ULP tuned aren't really too fussed about how good/bad the fuel is.

So in a boosted application you'll need to be careful as even factory turbo cars have PULP listed as the only option for good reason.

Also have you thought about what would happen if you get caught using the company card? Or do they know full well you'll be burning it up using on your own private use? Can't imagine a company would be happy with that.

I say go the 98 tune, use company car 80% of the time - don't need to drive a Skyline everywhere, you'll enjoy it more that way as well

Yeah 98 is the only way to go mate and BP fuels seem to be the highest octane and most consistent quality.

550cc (NISMO/Tomei) injectors are drop-in replacements and will be more than enough for a 2871R but then if you plan on upgrading the turbo and/or going E85 in future you might want more... 740cc or even bigger!

It's fair to say the positives greatly tip the scales in favor of 98, despite getting chest pains paying for it :P any recommendations on injectors to suit the 2871r now that I'm doing It all properly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
    • EMU Classic. For what I need it to do I see no reason to upgrade. Link and Haltech would both cost an extra chunk of money for a lot of unutilized features
×
×
  • Create New...