Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From what i was told today Ants GTR running Wolf3d had afew issues he couldnt sort out, so he switched to pfc d-jetro, supposedly it is the reason it now has 800hp instead of 680 odd. This was at xspeed who suggested i switch from wolf to pfc d-jetro on my s14 as im havving issues with it atm. Ant thought that it would give a better tune and start much better, as mine is a dog to start and idle with a/c + fan on etc. I dont know if i want to fork out near on $2k for another computer when i already have 1. I havent heard experiance's from many people running d-jetro yet and am interested to see if it will be worthwhile on a motor thats already done 178000kms.

Adam

to compare ants old engine combo to new combo would be a mistake by only the ecu (plus it made the 799rwhp on the wolf) they have gone to the d-jetro now

old combo was 2xgt30 turbos on a std 2.6 bottom end i believe

new combo is 2x to4z hks turbos 2.8 hks bottom end

so there are major differences in the basic engine combo and the hp you refer to was made on the wolf before going to the apexi (and i'm a apexi fan) All ecu will make hp if tuned properly BUT some much it easier then others and will be easier to live with (long live the pfc)

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Valid pionts lads!

Hearing more positives in respect to the PFC. Stands to reason in respect to pure # of them sold.

The ease of tunning the units in comparison to others is appealing, as long as the reliability and performanz are coupled.

A number of identiities tend to formulate a conception that the PFC falls over around 600 hp at crank ???

Where this came from i am not sure.

I am ( with the help from a knowledgable friends) going to try the Apexi pro.

Will let all who's interested know the results further down the track.

Any one want a cheap version 4 ?????????????????????????????????????????????

A number of identiities tend to formulate a conception that the PFC  falls over around 600 hp at crank ???

Hahahahahah :werd: :slap: :spew: :fart: :bonk: :dump: :chairshot

I have with my own eyes seen an Apexi PFC equiped R33 GTR make 1100 ps and do an 8.5 sec 1/4 at 165 mph (no NOS). And yes, it had a pair of Q45 AFM's as the primary load sensor. :uh-huh: :uh-huh:

Recently we have had an R31DET on the engine dyno that made 735 bhp, and you guessed it, Power FC and Q45 AFM's.

And then there is my own RB31DET......................

I think you get the hint:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...