Jump to content
SAU Community

Immobilising Points

mrsr32

By mrsr32,
in Car Audio & Electrical

 Share

Recommended Posts

CarbonCarSystems Collaborator

CarbonCarSystems

Posted
Posted

Hi There,

Yes you can use all of the above.


You can even get them in different spots, some on the drivers side, some on passenger side, some near the ECU or even engine bay.

Mix it up for the best security.

Also not that to be installed according to the AS/NZS you are required to use both Start & Fuel pump specifically and have all immobiliser cuts 30cm or more apart from each other.

Hope this helps ;D


mrsr32 Rising Star

mrsr32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

just installed a ebc into a r34 gtr and decided to unwrap some of the ignition wiring. the 5 start installed alarm has both relays wired to cuts that are next to each other :woot: . the wires werent even shortened, the're just bunched up and taped.

installer should be shot.

CarbonCarSystems Collaborator

CarbonCarSystems

Posted
Posted

Not good!


Often if doing the fuel pump as a cut out on a performance vehicle I wouldn't suggest running the immobiliser points through the drive/power wires of a fuel pump only the trigger wires for the relay / ecu output because the drive wires are a higher current then what most on board immobilisers can handle. It will cause an issue with fuel pump feed.

Alarm / Immobiliser relays can often only handle 15 amps.


Anyway just a heads up.


Thanks

Daniel Gardener

Carbon Car Systems

mrsr32 Rising Star

mrsr32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks, its a dynamco p765 and thinks it has 40a fuses, no biggie as both wires run down the side of the car.

i was also thinking of using the detach head unit as a kill switch and cutting fuel pump or something on the ecu side.

mrsr32 Rising Star

mrsr32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ok, what a mission.

had constant 12v for relays/siren

ign cut

starter cut

all done on the loom under the steering column.

relocated the constant 12v to furhter back in the loom.

cut ign in the guard and moved the siren there

replaced starter cut with my fuel pump 12v which is located towards the rear of the car.

at least i can sleep at night now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • PranK
      Noob

      By PranK · Posted

      Welcome to !
    • GTSBoy
      Freddy Plenum vs Genuine options RB25

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • BuiltNotBought
      Freddy Plenum vs Genuine options RB25

      By BuiltNotBought · Posted

      I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • GTSBoy
      Freddy Plenum vs Genuine options RB25

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • BuiltNotBought
      Freddy Plenum vs Genuine options RB25

      By BuiltNotBought · Posted

      So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...