Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I'm just looking sell my r33 it was off the road for a while whilst I rebuilt it and during that time I decided to buy another car and a house so basically I'm just looking to get rid of it quickly so I have some space.

Specs: 1994 R33 GTST - Calsonic Blue (custom colour) 120XXX km

Car was rebuilt to stock specs with all new gaskets, belts and hoses where needed. Can be viewed running and test driven.

post-31149-0-65583700-1362721239_thumb.jpg

post-31149-0-69161500-1362721254_thumb.jpg

post-31149-0-77678400-1362721264_thumb.jpg

post-31149-0-56183400-1362721279_thumb.jpg

post-31149-0-39546400-1362721308_thumb.jpg

The good:

Interior:
Drift D1 Seats (slightly faded)
Autometer Boost Gauge
Momo Gear Knob
Genuine C's Short Shifter (with original instructions)

Intake and Exhaust:
FMIC
K&N Pod
Turbosmart Plumback or Atmo BOV
Perspex Air Box
Cat Back Exhaust
Boost Controller
Exedy heavy Duty Clutch (installed 1 months ago)

Rims:
18" Chromies
18x8 Fronts
18x9 Rears

Car made 182kw on 9psi (dynomotive bayswater)

Also comes with a heap of spare parts: Stock cooler and piping, stock exhaust, stock seats, 2xr33 rims painted black, stock airbox with K&N filter and a spare rear wing.

The Bad:

Needs new alternator - current one won't charge properly

Drivers side window motor needs replacing.

Thrust Bearing is on the way out.

Currently no stereo - has speakers and all the wiring for amps etc.. (ill even throw in a couple of amps just needs a headunit)

Paintwork has been keyed down the passanger side door and roof, it is also missing some paint off the front bar.

Could also do with new rear tyres.


Asking $5,000 ono will also swap for a jetski (must have reg and trailer)

Call or message Andrew on 0406004135

Edited by zorb_rules
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...