Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ATM the exhaust is just cat back how big would you go the whole way through?

What's the diametre size of your car back?

If it's a 3", then go 3", if it's a 3.5" go 3.5" etc...

​Keep it consistent.

What N1 turbos you getting?

From memory they came from factory running about 1 Bar = 14.7 Psi.

(R32 GTR Nismo & N1 / R33 GTR N1 / R34 GTR V-Spec N1 & V-Spec II N1 / V-Spec II Nur / M-Spec Nur)

You could run a tad higher 1.1 Bar = 15.9 Psi / 1.2 Bar = 17.4 Psi.

What do you recommend? I'm open minded. Honestly, I was thinkin of purchasing the Garrett equivalents as I official N1 turbos would be pricey.

What's the diametre size of your car back?

If it's a 3", then go 3", if it's a 3.5" go 3.5" etc...

​Keep it consistent.

I thought these cars needed a little back flow. Having the whole exhaust the same size would not promote that.

What do you recommend? I'm open minded. Honestly, I was thinkin of purchasing the Garrett equivalents as I official N1 turbos would be pricey.

Yes, genuine N1 turbos would be pricey at the same time rare to find.

Garrett -7's would be the closest to the N1 equivalents.

I am running Garrett -7's with 15.5 Psi, which is just over 1 Bar.

Later I will run about 18 Psi = 1.2 Bar, but will get my mechanic to see what he thinks best.

Many factors are involved but you'd run what's safe for the engine / what the turbos can handle, so when you go in for a tune after the twin turbo installation, your mechanic should be able to gauge what it can run.

I thought these cars needed a little back flow. Having the whole exhaust the same size would not promote that.

Not that I know of... That theory might apply to N/A cars... As you can only go so big unless it's tuned for it...

With turbocharged cars, usually the bigger the better, but 3" / 3.5" is usually the upgrade we all go for and it frees up the exhaust flow.

:)

​Just in regards to your bigger front mount intercooler, you were better off spending the money on Down and Front Pipes with a High Flow Cat.

Giving your GTR a full exhaust upgrade will benefit you more at this stage, if you just want to keep it stock-ish...

Stock GTR front mount intercooler can handle 300+ kW's.

But anyway, all for the better in the long run.

I know it'll do 400+ kW's for a fact as well ;)

What's the diametre size of your car back?

If it's a 3", then go 3", if it's a 3.5" go 3.5" etc...

​Keep it consistent.

I apolagize it has a 3.5 inch all the way through just had a look before with that and a bigger intercooler does that add any more hp with out a tune? Just curious cause next step is a bigger fuel pump, injectors, tune and ecu yeah?

I know it'll do 400+ kW's for a fact as well ;)

:laugh: yes clearly, you would know!

Good and thanks for clarifying that!

I apolagize it has a 3.5 inch all the way through just had a look before with that and a bigger intercooler does that add any more hp with out a tune? Just curious cause next step is a bigger fuel pump, injectors, tune and ecu yeah?

So your exhaust is all good then!

Depends on what power out put you want... How many kW's you want?

Which determine if you need a bigger fuel pump / injectors / ECU / Tune or not...

:laugh: yes clearly, you would know!

Good and thanks for clarifying that!

So your exhaust is all good then!

Depends on what power out put you want... How many kW's you want?

Which determine if you need a bigger fuel pump / injectors / ECU / Tune or not...

I'm looking for 350 hp at the wheels..... So im guessing I need a fair bit

I'm looking for 350 hp at the wheels..... So im guessing I need a fair bit

Which is about 261 rwkW's.

You stock injectors / fuel pump / ECU can handle it.

The ECU will need a slight tweak but nothing crazy.

What ecu were you running?

Run a Nistune or an APex'i Power FC.

Id say that you will very quickly get bored of 250kw. So i would recommend a link ecu. I shouldve skipped the power fc stage and gone straight to a link

What link will you reccommend? Shouldn't get bored to quick as I'm only used to driving a vz sv6 haha

I'm looking for 350 hp at the wheels..... So im guessing I need a fair bit

Which is about 261 rwkW's.

You stock injectors / fuel pump / ECU can handle it.

The ECU will need a slight tweak but nothing crazy.

What ecu were you running?

Run a Nistune or an APex'i Power FC.

What's the highest stock whp that can be SAFELY achieved using stock components and N1 turbos?

Sent from my SC-03D

What's the highest stock whp that can be SAFELY achieved using stock components and N1 turbos?

Sent from my SC-03D

To be safe for street use, anywhere around the 300kW mark at the rear wheels.

Two friends of mine on SAU are running stock RB26's but one has Garrett -7's and the other has Garrett -9's

Both making 300rwkW's, which is about 402HP at the wheels, if you want to measure in HP.

You could push it further but it will depend on the condition of the engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...so a "development" here aswell The swap is "done" and car went "test drive" BUT it seems the clutch(maybe gearbox?) is a little bit sad? I bought this clutch kit https://justjap.com/products/xtreme-heavy-duty-organic-clutch-flywheel-kit-nissan-skyline-r31-r32-r33-push-type "Problem" is that the first gear is hard to put into and it seems that the clutch is not disengaged. It was not the problem with the old clutch...(or like sometime the first gear would not get as easy specialy when the fluid was cold) So? Can it be like...bad "install" or is the clutch wrong ((it should not have been) i done research to get the right one) Or is this "normal" with new clutch and needs to be break in? 
    • @Duncan I can try  and thanks i did not thought about VIN and part numbers for 33/34. @GTSBoy yeah it looks like iam gonna do that  
    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
×
×
  • Create New...