Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The time has come for me to sell my baby as there is a real one on its way and need a family car.

R33 gtst 1993

11 months rego

Custom white pearl respray (done two weeks ago)

Msport bodykit

Petrol 19inch 265/40

D1 coilovers

DBA slotted rotors

Tinted windows

GT28rs turbo

Sitfire coils

Front mount intercooler

2.5inch exhaust

Sony cd / dvd touch screen

Comes with a spare set of stock rims with 90% tread

I'm sure there is a lot I have missed

text or phone for more info

Sydney, Kellyville

$9,500 ono

041 659 9066

post-100916-0-47489800-1385887762_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-63985400-1385887778_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-75564400-1385887789_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-32242100-1385887800_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-67617700-1385887813_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-85247400-1385887865_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-24618500-1385887887_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-60686000-1385887901_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-15544000-1385888516_thumb.gif

Edited by 1300
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435802-r33-gtst-custom-paint-sydney/
Share on other sites

It kills me to say it because you've put your car up for such a good price but I suggest doing what I do and just throw a baby seat in the back, works fine for the wife/baby and I.

The wife is pretty short though so she fits in the back seat without any problems.

What led up to the painting.

I'm a spray painter so I do this for a living and thought the car would sell easier with a new bodykit and a custom colour change.

I would like to keep it a little longer and enjoy/see the hard work I've put into the car but must look to the future.

No short cuts, our shop would charge +6K. for a job like this so I think the car is a fair price and it is "or near offer".

A few pics at the shop trial fitting the bodykit as you can see the body is straight before I started.

post-100916-0-76900800-1386241181_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-89836700-1386241228_thumb.gif

post-100916-0-73438800-1386241242_thumb.gif

Edited by 1300
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...