Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm selling my evo 9, its red and has low kms (59xxx), it is in excellent condition, outside is about 9/10 and inside pretty much 10/10. I have taken excellent care of it and have only used top of the line oils and parts.

I am second owner and i bought it off a very wealthy gentleman from QLD so no expense was spared on his part either. When i purchased the car it was pretty much stock apart from the turbo back exhaust. I have since then modified little bits and pieces here and there (nothing to major).

So the reason for selling it (really didn't wish i had to because it took so long to find one in this condition as I am a very picky buyer) is because I am planning on purchasing a business and putting down a deposit for a home and land package so this money will be well used to help the purchase of these two things.

A quick run down of the car;

- 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 9
- Red in colour
- 59xxx KMS with Log Books and manuals with all receipts of any work done to the car (and i mean every little work is documented and business cards to go along with it too).
- 3rd party Pre Purchase inspection completed on my behalf before buying it from the first owner
- I have a paint thickness gauge which you can use personally on the car to show that there are absolutely no signs of resprays or touch ups or accidents on the car.

Modifications;
- Full 3'' Custom Turbo Back Exhaust (made by a reputable exhaust shop in QLD - I will get the name when I can its in the log book and manuals case).
- x3e intercooler piping in black (upper and lower)
- Simota Drop in panel filter - retaining stock air box
- Short Antenna
- Beatrush front number plate holder
- Stock Enkei's powder coated black
- Carbon Fibre front lip
- Carbon Fibre roof spoiler/shark fins/vortex
- Carbon Fibre rear diffuser
- Whiteline Adjustable 24mm Rear Sway Bar
- Whiteline Adjustable HD Rear End links

the photos are dated for the meanwhile, but I will take new photos and attach them soon.

Some information I may have missed out on mentioning but if they come to mind I will edit the post and add it in.

Location and Price;
I am located in Green Valley, 2168, NSW.
Contact number is 0415 605 565 - SMS Pref during weekdays and either call or text on weekends.
Price wise I'm looking/asking for $38000 ono - it is really immaculate so it does warrant the price.

FOR PICS

Gumtree link

http://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/green-valley/cars-vans-utes/2006-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution-9-ix/1042523855

  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...