Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey i just bought a r32 skyline gts-4 and im just curious what are the best yet not too pricey mods i should do to it???

i was also curious what parts i can swap straight over from a gtr like brakes or ??? trying to save a bit of cash haha..

also i was wondering if i was to upgrade the turbo which would be the best turbo i could get for a good price?? dont mind second hand ones either??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44315-need-help-with-mod-choices/
Share on other sites

Finish exhaust if u havent? i.e dump/front - $300+-

Then CAI (pod etc) - pretty cheap depending what brand or custom made

Electronic Boost controller or manual bleeder - from $50 to $800(e-01) etc

Piggy back ecu - either emanage or safc? chipped ecu even from $200 to $500, controls timing ignition and fuel maps for larger gains

They are the above 3 reasonable cheap mods which will get you largest gains then you step into another sorta stage:

Larger Turbo

FMIC

Injectors

Standalone ECU - motec autronic power fc

fuel pump, afm etc etc etc

Suspension work

list goes on...

Best thing is to use the search function mate...threads everywhere!

Best most popular turbo depending on how much u wanna spend...

Well u can either highflow...or just buy a HKS 2530 2535 2540 or similar, straight bolt on so u dont have to change wastegates etc...not sure on outputs but ur looking around the $1500 to $2000 for 2nd hand or high flowing

Once again their are tonnes of threads in Forced Induction Forums covering best turbos for every type of budget and power output required

isnt the gts-4 a non turbo all wheel drive ???

anyways what blade said is spot on if $$$'s are limited nice flowing exhaust (full exhaust), pod filter possibly try advancing the timing if you are careful it can reap some small rewards and yea depends on what you want to spend mods are only limited by your budget.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...