Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Recently had my 32 Gtr on the dyno to fix an unrelated boost controller issue which has now been solved. However the problem is my car has lost roughly 150hp since it was first tuned.

Specs of my setup

Stock 26 motor

Type B Poncams

3582R

All supporting mods, Exhaust, Fuel etc.

It was tuned on a hub dyno originally and made 510hp at the rear. Just recently my tuner has bought his own roller dyno which is what my car has recently been on. Obviously you expect some power loss because of the different dyno (he has a few other cars which have been on the same hub dyno as mine and they have experience about a 10% drop in figures). So now im trying to figure out how my car has gone from 510 all the way down to 365.

I have checked the following things;

-Ive removed each piece of the exhaust and checked for blockages and there is none (no cat)

-Ive done a compression test, 152-158 across all cylinders

-Ive taken the timing cover off and rotated the engine until the timing marks on the cam gears lined up with those on the head. Not sure if there is a way of me getting the motor to TDC without being able to see the gear at the bottom to ensure i have checked that the belt has not skipped a tooth? The belt and tensioners etc. were changed prior to the car first getting tuned.

When the car was on the dyno there were no obvious reasons as to why the car had lost power. It held boost fine, AFR stayed constant...Tuner said between 7 and 8k rpm it started to break down a little which may be because of the stock coil packs, but couldnt cause 150hp difference.

I've run out of ideas and its doing my head in, so any suggestions would be great.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450685-gtr-down-on-power/
Share on other sites

I'd suggest, unless it feels significantly slower than it used to, that it hasn't lost any real power.

Trust conversion/comparisons between dynos at your peril. If the ignition timing is the same, the boost is the same and the AFRs are the same, and there are no blockages or boost leaks, then the power shouldn't be much different.

One thing you didn't say you'd looked for properly was boost leaks.

I recently lost a lot of power on my car and did all i could to get it back. Timing was bit retarded and advancing it got a lot of it back.

BUT then I did my service which was overdue - plugs, oil flush/ new oil, oil filter, new air filter - BAM a completely different car!

Service - a simple overlooked thing. Do it if you havent/

Edited by rondofj

I can see what your saying with comparing dynos, I'm just concerned because the variance is so large. In terms of boost leaks, couldn't hear anything when it was on the dyno and held boost fine. I'll have a closer look at the intercoooler pipes and stuff anyway. Car was serviced probably less than 2k ago. Good tyres and good clutch. He has just had another gtr on there, had - 5's, similar cams and 17psi...made 370? Does this sound about right or should it be more also?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...