Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about how I need to route everything cooling system wise on my R34 Neo build. I want to ensure that the correct coolant flow paths are maintained. I have been referring to this which has been quite useful:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423082-rb25-coolant-flow-hose-swirl-pot-header-tank-setup/?hl=%2Bremove+%2Bheater+%2Bpiping

However my setup is a bit different and possibly pretty unique. I would really appreciated thoughts on my proposed solution. My setup will be as follows:

  • Running a plenum similar to the Hypertune ones. It has no coolant hose connections at all, other than the ports coming out of the head and the radiator top hose outlet.
  • I'm running an electric water pump which is controlled by a computer. The water pump is located inline on the bottom radiator hose.
  • No thermostat is installed.
  • Old water pump internals have been removed and a plate welded over the front to seal it up.
  • The heater and heater pipes have been removed.
  • Oil warmer/cooler and piping has been removed.
  • No throttle body warmer will be used.

So basically I am left with just the turbo water return line and the IAC/AAC valve thing to worry about (I guess I might as well keep the cold start functionality). I want to keep things as simple as possible.

Originally I was thinking that I would need to route the turbo return and the IAC valve to either the hose connections coming out of thermostat housing (1 and 2 on kitto's pictures in the link above) or from the connection towards the rear of the block (3, 4 and 5). Due to my water pump setup / location I don't think this will work for my applications. I am proposing the following:

  • Block the hose connections coming from the thermostat housing (1 and 2).
  • Block the rear connection on the block (3, 4 and 5).
  • Run the turbo coolant return line through the IAC valve (it has three connections, I will block the middle one).
  • Plumb the outlet of the IAC valve into an adapter which will go into the radiator top hose near the plenum outlet.

I think I need to setup as above as the turbo will be fed coolant under pressure from the passenger side of the block and I will need to ensure the return goes back somewhere on the other side of the water pump. Given the location of my water pump I think this would be the best option?

I also no longer have the coolant bleed points and I was thinking of getting a swirl pot / breather tank, however I think the radiator cap will now be the highest point in the system, so I'm hoping I don't have to worry about that either? The only part of the system that I think might be around the same height will be the turbo water feed line (high mount turbo).

Sorry for the long post, but if any learned SAU members could give me some feedback i would greatly appreciate it!!

Cheers :cheers:

Will you use a davies craig pump ?

We used at my work on an engine dyno to pump water through an oil cooler of a 2L diesel engine and a water to water heat exchanger. The pump was OK performance wise but it only lasted 400 hours before being replaced. It worked with only 50 to 70°C water temps and some fins broke or something as the pump was heavily vibrating.

And on another engine 2 stroke single cylinder petrol engine, still on an engine dyno an other pump but same model pump (EWP115) has been tested as a primary water pump. The coolant circuit was kept relatively simple : engine, a coolant flow meter, a water heater and the water to water heat exchanger.

The pump despite being fed with around 12.8v was not able to meet our coolant flow target.

Well the engine had a pretty restrictive flow path inside it but the pump was really weak for that use.

So my 2 cents is keep away of the EWP pump as a primary water pump for your engine.

But the EWP pump controller is worth a watch. I'm in the process of fitting one to control a electric motor that will power the STD water pump. As you I might remove the thermostat. It will remove a big restriction in the coolant circuit, allowing more flow but a lot less delta P before and after the pump leading to a lot less cavitation at high rpm. :)

As for your plate that replace the water pump beware that it might not let a lot of space for the water to go through between the plate and the block. The pump is making a canal with the block to allow the water to flow through. Your plate will make this path a lot narrower. I would look into fitting a emptied water pump if possible.

Iin the thermostat housing I would also block the by pass where the thermostat is being placed. When the engine is cold a part of the coolant goes through this by pass to allow a evenly warm up of the block. As you will control the warm up of the engine without coolant flow when it's not needed, you do not need this by-pass anymore and when hot you will put more "fresh" wate through the engine leading to a greater cooling capacity.

I will re-run the turbo water exit at the inlet side of the pump. It will lessen a bit the flow of cool water coming from the radiator but I prefer ensuring a good flow through the turbo. From factory it is plumbed exactly like that so I don't see as a real problem, just a small loss of efficiency. Given the gain that could be made with the rest of your setup if done correctly, I find this acceptable.

Once you change the intake manifold the highest point of the coolant circuit is effectively the radiator. My 20 is setup like that and didn't needed any precaution to be bleeded correctly. :)

Hope that helps. :)

Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated. I will continue with my plan to plumb the turbo return back into the top radiator hose and won't bother with a breather tank.

The plate over the old water pump will be fine, the body of the old pump is still there so there is plenty of room for the coolant to move through. The plate is just to seal where the old clutch fan connected.

Yes I am using an alloy Davies Craig EWP. I will be happy even if it only lasts 400 hours, the car won't be driven much!

Edited by JustinP

Just to clarify, you have plated off inside the pump where the mechanical impeller normally is right? So it is essentially just a passage from the thermostat housing to the main water gallery supply on the passenger side of the engine block?

You say your water inlet is via the thermostat housing (no thermostat). Where is the water outlet?

Yes that is correct, the plate is actually on the outside of the pump to seal it back up with the internals removed. The coolant still goes in through the (now empty) thermostat housing and through to that inlet on the front / passenger side of the block, like normal.

The coolant then exits the engine / head via an outlet on the front of the plenum, pretty much like the stock setup. The only thing is the plenum does not have any other coolant inlet / outlets which is why I need to work out the best way to plumb in the turbo return / IAC valve plumbing.

Actually I should have just posted a couple of pictures of it, would have been much easier! :yes: Will take some now.

Cheers

Justin

Well then it looks OK for me. :)

Just take the most powerful pump from EWP and feed it with the highest tension you can.

I hope it will flow enough to cope with your power goal. Because you don't have the thermostat you should install 2 water temp sender, on at the inlet of the engine and the other on the exit to check the temperature rise. Ideally it shouldn't be higher than 10°C when the engine is at temperature and the controller is regulating, to get a correct cooling of the entire block, not just overcool the front cylinder while the lasts ones are burning.

If you have a delta too high, then the pump is not powerful enough. You'll need to install a second one or find another more powerful.

I know that pierburg are making some powerful pump which are used in wrc and on the last bmw //M. But they need to be pwm feeded if I remember correctly. The EWP controller can't do that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...