Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you look at the arias AP331154A RB25 pistons with a 12.5cc dome, you get 9.1:1

Note Arias call these an 8.1:1 comp piston, but check the comp height, these will likely sit 0.005" further down the bore

Just trying to sort out this deck height problem, I have two spare standard rb25 blocks here at home both measuring 188.6mm deck height and both have .020" (0.5mm) piston out of the top of the block. So I'm assuming the rb25det has a negative deck height standard. So my current block I'm using is .029" (0.7mm) out the top with the cp Pistons I have meaning only 0.2mm) has been decked from the block. Can anyone confirm this?

Just trying to sort out this deck height problem, I have two spare standard rb25 blocks here at home both measuring 188.6mm deck height and both have .020" (0.5mm) piston out of the top of the block. So I'm assuming the rb25det has a negative deck height standard. So my current block I'm using is .029" (0.7mm) out the top with the cp Pistons I have meaning only 0.2mm) has been decked from the block. Can anyone confirm this?

Anyone confirm how much negative deck height on a stock block

I wouldnt be too concerned about how far the piston sticks out of the block if its a slight amount.

I be very worried about the piston to head clearance, you need to allow for stretch and rock at change of direction when at song so they dont physically meet.

If your dech was taller (not decked) you would run a thinner head gasket to keep the same head to piston clearance (that you were looking for).

Do not try to radically increase compression by running the head gasket so thin that the pistons and head will meet.

Whatever the dome is on the piston, will not effect compression much far from what they were designed to produce by the manufaturer by your blocks deck height, either way you will need to keep the piston and head appart a certain amount.

If your chasing a compression increase and already have a piston to head clearance of around 1mm (40 thou) with your calculations, start looking for a larger domed piston, going any thinner on the head gasket could end in disaster.

Your engine builder should be aware of all this.....speak to them as they will know the piston to head clearance.

If your piston sticks out 1mm, you can get the decks machined down while leaving the dome alone to increase compression, another way to bump up what your after because you can run a thinner head gasket while maintaining the correct quench between the pistons and head.

Edited by GTRPSI

Thanks for the reply, not concerned with having high compression, I'd be happy with anything between 9:1 and 9.5:1, more concerned with things being too close more than Anything. The Pistons are .029" out the top was just wanting to know where they sit on a standard block. Cheers

Do your calculations then based on a 1.75mm head gasket (or as your builder advises) if chasing a 40 thou quench, how far the pistons protrude above the deck top should not be an issue unless the top ring land position is questionable.

Mine are 0.6mm out of the deck on my RB26/30.....means little as long as there is enough room for assembly stretch and piston rock at high RPM.

But not too much space, you dont want secondard detonation pockets. ;)

You can provide less space if Red line RPM's are kept under check.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...